 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
I was NOT criticizing Andrew's work which is a nice picture :-)
I was playing at a kind of Rorschach test.
I agree we don't need to see something representative in every image or
paint.
But in this case, shapes and colors immediately made me feel the sweet taste
of a sugar block dipped in coffee.
BTW Andrew, did you give a try at MLPov's bockeh focal blur?
IMOH it gives a better quality and more natural (pigment controlled) blur
than official version(squared).
You can find this patch here http://pov.monde.free.fr/mael/mlpov081eng.html
Cheers
Marc
3e2f3306@news.povray.org...
> The fact that you see somthing in it makes it an abstract. If the artist
> intended you to see something in it. If the artist created it just for the
> look that was created then it is call non-objective art.
>
> I thank it is a very good non-objective piece and it looks like it could
be
> great for the background of a webpage or titleing of a video.
>
> As for getting around to real scenes I would say this is better than some
of
> the "real" scenes I have seen. A grood graphic artist has to learn how to
> make simple shapes look great. you did just that. Good job.
>
> "Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoo fr> wrote in message
> news:3e2ef974@news.povray.org...
> > I see sugar blocs with coffea
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
news:3e2fa2be@news.povray.org...
> BTW Andrew, did you give a try at MLPov's bockeh focal blur?
> IMOH it gives a better quality and more natural (pigment controlled) blur
> than official version(squared).
> You can find this patch here http://pov.monde.free.fr/mael/mlpov081eng.html
No Marc, I didn't, but I don't know why I didn't think to try it. I have MLPov already
and
have played about with bockeh FB. I will re-render and post the scene again (complete
with a
few minor changes)
All the best,
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I was just pointing out the use of the word "abstract" Most people call
non-objective art abstract.
Abstract is a non realistic depictions of a subject.
Non-abjective does not depict anything but the art.
It is very common to see things in non-objective art. That is where the
Rorschach test comes in.
Sorry if I sounded like I had problems with your comments. I was just
passing on some of this costly education of mine.
I am looking forward to more work like this.
"Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
news:3e2fa2be@news.povray.org...
> Hi,
> I was NOT criticizing Andrew's work which is a nice picture :-)
> I was playing at a kind of Rorschach test.
> I agree we don't need to see something representative in every image or
> paint.
> But in this case, shapes and colors immediately made me feel the sweet
taste
> of a sugar block dipped in coffee.
>
> BTW Andrew, did you give a try at MLPov's bockeh focal blur?
> IMOH it gives a better quality and more natural (pigment controlled) blur
> than official version(squared).
> You can find this patch here
http://pov.monde.free.fr/mael/mlpov081eng.html
>
> Cheers
> Marc
>
>
> 3e2f3306@news.povray.org...
> > The fact that you see somthing in it makes it an abstract. If the artist
> > intended you to see something in it. If the artist created it just for
the
> > look that was created then it is call non-objective art.
> >
> > I thank it is a very good non-objective piece and it looks like it could
> be
> > great for the background of a webpage or titleing of a video.
> >
> > As for getting around to real scenes I would say this is better than
some
> of
> > the "real" scenes I have seen. A grood graphic artist has to learn how
to
> > make simple shapes look great. you did just that. Good job.
> >
> > "Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
> > news:3e2ef974@news.povray.org...
> > > I see sugar blocs with coffea
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Agh.. one day I'll find the time to code 'real' scenes, but for now I seem
to be stuck in
> minimal abstract stuff. Anyway, I think it's quite pretty.
Mmm, that could SO be me... But hey, let's be seriouse here - I couldn't do
realistic if I tried! LOL
But getting back to the point...
I like this image. It's simple, but it's cool.
Hope you don't get "un-stuck" too soon - I rather like where you're at now
;-)
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lol no offence at all :)
I must say that English isn't my language so I can miss important parts of a
message
3e3050b4@news.povray.org...
> I was just pointing out the use of the word "abstract" Most people call
> non-objective art abstract.
>
> Abstract is a non realistic depictions of a subject.
> Non-abjective does not depict anything but the art.
>
> It is very common to see things in non-objective art. That is where the
> Rorschach test comes in.
>
> Sorry if I sounded like I had problems with your comments. I was just
> passing on some of this costly education of mine.
>
> I am looking forward to more work like this.
>
So do I :-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Andrew Coppin" <orp### [at] btinternetcom> wrote in message
news:3e306602@news.povray.org...
> > Agh.. one day I'll find the time to code 'real' scenes, but for now I seem
> to be stuck in
> > minimal abstract stuff. Anyway, I think it's quite pretty.
>
> Mmm, that could SO be me... But hey, let's be seriouse here - I couldn't do
> realistic if I tried! LOL
>
> But getting back to the point...
>
> I like this image. It's simple, but it's cool.
>
> Hope you don't get "un-stuck" too soon - I rather like where you're at now
> ;-)
> Andrew.
Thanks :-)
All the best,
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here's a final update of the scene, with minor changes (block rotation). Scene file
posted in
p.b.s-f.
All the best,
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Rad_Blocks_v3.5.jpg' (64 KB)
Preview of image 'Rad_Blocks_v3.5.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It IS pretty nice. :o)
Makes me appriciate abstract art....
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Andrew, you are my hero ^_^
"Andrew Cocker" <mai### [at] andrewcockercouk> wrote in message
news:3e2eb58f@news.povray.org...
> Agh.. one day I'll find the time to code 'real' scenes, but for now I seem
to be stuck in
> minimal abstract stuff. Anyway, I think it's quite pretty.
>
> --
> All the best,
>
> Andy Cocker
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Optium" <Opt### [at] coxnet> wrote in message news:3e31e536$1@news.povray.org...
> Andrew, you are my hero ^_^
Blimey! Let's not get carried away now..
All the best,
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
