I was just pointing out the use of the word "abstract" Most people call
non-objective art abstract.

Abstract is a non realistic depictions of a subject.
Non-abjective does not depict anything but the art.

It is very common to see things in non-objective art. That is where the
Rorschach test comes in.

Sorry if I sounded like I had problems with your comments. I was just
passing on some of this costly education of mine.

I am looking forward to more work like this.

"Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
news:3e2fa2be@news.povray.org...
> Hi,
> I was NOT criticizing Andrew's work which is a nice picture :-)
> I was playing at a kind of Rorschach test.
> I agree we don't need to see something representative in every image or
> paint.
> But in this case, shapes and colors immediately made me feel the sweet
taste
> of a sugar block  dipped in coffee.
>
> BTW Andrew, did you give a try at MLPov's bockeh focal blur?
> IMOH it gives a better quality and more natural (pigment controlled) blur
> than official version(squared).
> You can find this patch here
http://pov.monde.free.fr/mael/mlpov081eng.html
>
> Cheers
> Marc
>
>

> 3e2f3306@news.povray.org...
> > The fact that you see somthing in it makes it an abstract. If the artist
> > intended you to see something in it. If the artist created it just for
the
> > look that was created then it is call non-objective art.
> >
> > I thank it is a very good non-objective piece and it looks like it could
> be
> > great for the background of a webpage or titleing of a video.
> >
> > As for getting around to real scenes I would say this is better than
some
> of
> > the "real" scenes I have seen. A grood graphic artist has to learn how
to
> > make simple shapes look great. you did just that. Good job.
> >
> > "Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
> > news:3e2ef974@news.povray.org...
> > > I see sugar blocs with coffea
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message