![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Tina!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
If this involves (and I'm pretty sure it does) functions, then
that's a no-no... I didn't have the time yet to fully understand
functions (I know, they're not THAT difficult), and once I
get comfortable with them and really grasp them, I guess
I could tackle a lot of stuff (concerning animations, objects,
repulsion etc)...
But until then, I'd like to stay focussed on what I'm already
capable of, and move further when I've got more time and
less stress...
Still, thanks for the suggestion, I'll keep it in mind.
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmx de
>
> If you don't want to create animations but just want the final result you
> could try implementing a gradient descent method. This means you don't
> actually integrate the equations of movement but move the nodes according
> to the gradient of the potential field of all (static) forces influencing
> it. This would avoid the possible instability and oscillation problems
> but of course can lead to wrong results as well.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I don't get this...
What or who is Tina?
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmx de
> Tina!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Thanks! Yeah, this one looks rather "solid"...
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmx de
"Hugo" <hua### [at] post3 tele dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3d80a3e0$1@news.povray.org...
> I look forward to see your next implementations! This one is good! But I
> would think twice before touching it with my hand. ;o)
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Tim Nikias wrote:
>
> If this involves (and I'm pretty sure it does) functions, then
> that's a no-no...
No, it does not (although it could simplify certain things to use
functions, for example you could use the gradient calculation macros from
'math.inc').
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Hey! It's a Tribble! ;)
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmx de> wrote in message
news:3d80bd9a$1@news.povray.org...
> I don't get this...
>
> What or who is Tina?
>
http://eightiesclub.tripod.com/id89.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Oh, now I get it!
:-)
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmx de
> > I don't get this...
> >
> > What or who is Tina?
> >
>
> http://eightiesclub.tripod.com/id89.htm
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Awesome.
I'm reminded of the Star Trek episode, "The Trouble with the Tribbles."
There is a great short clip from the episode here:
http://www.starfleetlibrary.com/tos/tos2/the_trouble_with_tribbles.htm
Aaron
Aaron Gillies
x3rxes[*]yahoo.com
New York City
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"St." <dot### [at] dot com> wrote in message news:3d80d718$1@news.povray.org...
> Hey! It's a Tribble! ;)
>
> ~Steve~
Dang ...
Someone beat me to the Tribble reference. :(
Aaron
Aaron Gillies
New York City
x3rxes[%]yahoo.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |