POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : The deck MKII Server Time
15 Aug 2024 18:17:56 EDT (-0400)
  The deck MKII (Message 1 to 3 of 3)  
From: Kevin Loney
Subject: The deck MKII
Date: 25 May 2002 17:25:09
Message: <3cf00135@news.povray.org>
k, after taking a look at the response from my last post, the general
consensus was I should raise the railings. I agree with Rune however, and
personally preferred them a bit lower, however after a quick adjustment I
think they look a lot better and there still fairly low and out of the way.
I also added the extra support along the long railing (I tried one, but I
like the two). And finally I added the table in the middle. Okay, I know
it's missing supports between the top and the bottom but there isos and were
taking way to long to render so I commented them out for the time being. I'm
wondering though if it's to small radius wise though.

--
Kevin
http://www.geocities.com/qsquared_1999/
#macro _(r)#if(r<12)#local i=asc(substr("oqshilacefg",r,1))-97;
disc{<mod(i,7)-3,div(i,7)-1,6>,z,.4pigment{rgb 10}}_(r+1)
#end#end _(1)//KL


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'dreaming3.jpg' (120 KB)

Preview of image 'dreaming3.jpg'
dreaming3.jpg


 

From: Greg Gargett
Subject: Re: The deck MKII
Date: 25 May 2002 18:20:24
Message: <3cf00e28$1@news.povray.org>
"Kevin Loney" <klo### [at] pt2mcom> wrote in message
news:3cf00135@news.povray.org...
> k, after taking a look at the response from my last post, the general
> consensus was I should raise the railings. I agree with Rune however, and
> personally preferred them a bit lower, however after a quick adjustment I
> think they look a lot better and there still fairly low and out of the
way.
> I also added the extra support along the long railing (I tried one, but I
> like the two). And finally I added the table in the middle. Okay, I know
> it's missing supports between the top and the bottom but there isos and
were
> taking way to long to render so I commented them out for the time being.
I'm
> wondering though if it's to small radius wise though.
>
 hey, better!

i would only suggest that the corner posts seem too wide, as someone
mentioned before.  i may even suggest round corner posts to mimic common
pilings as i know this structure will end-up over water.

also, try narrower floor planks to see how they look.  they still seem
slightly too wide to me.

oh, one more thing.  the extrta rail supports you added seem a little
insubstantial.  try making them the same as your other small posts.

dang, i haven't even started my IRTC scene yet.  looks like i'm fallig
behind.

greg


Post a reply to this message

From: Kevin Loney
Subject: Re: The deck MKII (iso version)
Date: 25 May 2002 18:28:19
Message: <3cf01003@news.povray.org>
This is the one with all the isos. Should have posted it with the other one,
but to late now.

--
Kevin
http://www.geocities.com/qsquared_1999/
#macro _(r)#if(r<12)#local i=asc(substr("oqshilacefg",r,1))-97;
disc{<mod(i,7)-3,div(i,7)-1,6>,z,.4pigment{rgb 10}}_(r+1)
#end#end _(1)//KL


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'dreaming4.jpg' (135 KB)

Preview of image 'dreaming4.jpg'
dreaming4.jpg


 

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.