|
 |
"Corey Woodworth" <cdw### [at] mpinet net> wrote :
>
> Some of Gilles' work is post-processed:
Much of it is not. Much of his best work is not. Even the page you
reference is not what he presents as his finished version. And every image
he has posted here, I am willing to bet, is not post processed.
Again, I have never said that there is not a use for post-processing.
Just that that use is not preparation of images for posting here.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
"Michael Goldshteyn" <mik### [at] wwacom> wrote in message
news:3cdbd342$1@news.povray.org...
> Because, I used minimal JPEG compression (i.e. best quality) and, as always,
> if you think it's not worth the download, don't download. Every civilized
> news reader now days shows the file size.
>
> Mike
I said I was wondering, not complaining. Sorry I wasn't clear. I do not have
Photoshop and am unaware of its capabilities.
Didn't know that a compressed image could be "decompressed", as it were.
I can understand your defensive stance, though, since you appear to be under attack in
this thread! ;-)
Personally, I don't care if you enhance every posted image if you have the time and
inclination. I would take it as a
challenge to attempt the
enhancement within POV itself. Some people may not care much for that, though. Some
would rather see original works posted
here.
--
Robert Chaffe
http://www.donovansweb.com/~chaffe/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
=?utf-8?Q?Elias_Penttil=C3=A4?= wrote:
>Hi, this is just my three day modeling and two day rendering test, it's not
>perfect, but I won't render it again for awhile.
>
>"Rendering time 2d 19h 31m 03s."
>
What code did you use for water? I couldn't make my glass of water lighter.
Thanks,
Connie
Post a reply to this message
|
|
