From: JPGargoyle
Subject: Re: the spaceship wip
Date: 20 Dec 2001 14:57:50
Message: <3c2242be@news.povray.org>
Very good model.
But I think it would look a little more like a space ship if it was more
"aerodynamic" on the front side.
More conic shaped, at least in those spikes that are projected to the front.
I know this will be difficult to do specially if (as I guess) this is all
CSG done right?
But certainly is a very good model.
Good work :)
Best regards.
"Simon Adameit" <gom### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3c1f5a50@news.povray.org...
>> Hi, It doesn't look pre or after TOS like but how do you like it?>
From: Simon Adameit
Subject: Re: the spaceship wip
Date: 21 Dec 2001 07:20:09
Message: <3c2328f9@news.povray.org>
JPGargoyle <jpg### [at] clixpt> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
3c2242be@news.povray.org...
> Very good model.>> But I think it would look a little more like a space ship if it was more> "aerodynamic" on the front side.> More conic shaped, at least in those spikes that are projected to the
front.
> I know this will be difficult to do specially if (as I guess) this is all> CSG done right?>> But certainly is a very good model.> Good work :)
Thanks.
How do you know that the front is not going to be aerodynamic? I haven't
modeled it yet :-)
Simon Adameit wrote:
> JPGargoyle <jpg### [at] clixpt> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:> > But I think it would look a little more like a space ship> > if it was more "aerodynamic" on the front side.> Thanks. How do you know that the front is not going to> be aerodynamic? I haven't modeled it yet :-)
Why does a SPACE ship need to be aerodynamic? ;)
--
Tim Cook
http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
From: Simon Adameit
Subject: Re: the spaceship wip
Date: 22 Dec 2001 01:28:11
Message: <3c2427fb$1@news.povray.org>
Timothy R. Cook <z99### [at] bellsouthnet> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
3C239724.A7474641@bellsouth.net...
> Simon Adameit wrote:> > JPGargoyle <jpg### [at] clixpt> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:> > > But I think it would look a little more like a space ship> > > if it was more "aerodynamic" on the front side.>> > Thanks. How do you know that the front is not going to> > be aerodynamic? I haven't modeled it yet :-)>> Why does a SPACE ship need to be aerodynamic? ;)
Render time. I'm planning to make an animation where it's flying through
some media ;-)
It looks like a warp capable drone of some kind - no rows of little white window
rectangles.
Simon Adameit wrote:
> Hi, It doesn't look pre or after TOS like but how do you like it?>> [Image]