POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : the spaceship wip Server Time
17 Aug 2024 02:26:33 EDT (-0400)
  the spaceship wip (Message 11 to 15 of 15)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: JPGargoyle
Subject: Re: the spaceship wip
Date: 20 Dec 2001 14:57:50
Message: <3c2242be@news.povray.org>
Very good model.

But I think it would look a little more like a space ship if it was more
"aerodynamic" on the front side.
More conic shaped, at least in those spikes that are projected to the front.
I know this will be difficult to do specially if (as I guess) this is all
CSG done right?

But certainly is a very good model.
Good work :)


Best regards.

"Simon Adameit" <gom### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3c1f5a50@news.povray.org...
>
> Hi, It doesn't look pre or after TOS like but how do you like it?
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Simon Adameit
Subject: Re: the spaceship wip
Date: 21 Dec 2001 07:20:09
Message: <3c2328f9@news.povray.org>
JPGargoyle <jpg### [at] clixpt> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
3c2242be@news.povray.org...
> Very good model.
>
> But I think it would look a little more like a space ship if it was more
> "aerodynamic" on the front side.
> More conic shaped, at least in those spikes that are projected to the
front.
> I know this will be difficult to do specially if (as I guess) this is all
> CSG done right?
>
> But certainly is a very good model.
> Good work :)

Thanks.
How do you know that the front is not going to be aerodynamic? I haven't
modeled it yet :-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Timothy R  Cook
Subject: Re: the spaceship wip
Date: 21 Dec 2001 15:10:34
Message: <3C239724.A7474641@bellsouth.net>
Simon Adameit wrote:
> JPGargoyle <jpg### [at] clixpt> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
> > But I think it would look a little more like a space ship
> > if it was more "aerodynamic" on the front side.

> Thanks.  How do you know that the front is not going to
> be aerodynamic? I haven't modeled it yet :-)

Why does a SPACE ship need to be aerodynamic?  ;)
-- 
Tim Cook
http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


Post a reply to this message

From: Simon Adameit
Subject: Re: the spaceship wip
Date: 22 Dec 2001 01:28:11
Message: <3c2427fb$1@news.povray.org>
Timothy R. Cook <z99### [at] bellsouthnet> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
3C239724.A7474641@bellsouth.net...
> Simon Adameit wrote:
> > JPGargoyle <jpg### [at] clixpt> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
> > > But I think it would look a little more like a space ship
> > > if it was more "aerodynamic" on the front side.
>
> > Thanks.  How do you know that the front is not going to
> > be aerodynamic? I haven't modeled it yet :-)
>
> Why does a SPACE ship need to be aerodynamic?  ;)
Render time. I'm planning to make an animation where it's flying through
some media ;-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Bryan Valencia
Subject: Re: the spaceship wip
Date: 14 Jan 2002 14:06:24
Message: <3C432C68.62F7A069@209software.com>
It looks like a warp capable drone of some kind - no rows of little white window
rectangles.

Simon Adameit wrote:

> Hi, It doesn't look pre or after TOS like but how do you like it?
>
>  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.