 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
now i have put together ALL hints and tips. except the volume body i
implemented everything. the result is the following image.
comments and everything for better changes are welcome.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'pillar_wip.jpg' (60 KB)
Preview of image 'pillar_wip.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"marabou" <not### [at] available yet> wrote in message
news:3c15525f@news.povray.org...
>
> now i have put together ALL hints and tips. except the volume body i
> implemented everything. the result is the following image.
> comments and everything for better changes are welcome.
>
Um... if you used radiosity I would bet dollars to donuts it wasn't rendered
with v3.1
Looks pretty good though.
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TinCanMan wrote:
...
>
> Um... if you used radiosity I would bet dollars to donuts it wasn't
> rendered with v3.1
>
> Looks pretty good though.
>
> -tgq
i do not know the term. do i get donuts or do i get dollars? ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think its a very low-mooded image. Sort of impresses as being a
calm and quiete place. I like the colors, though I think
the four spheres in the background, placed neatly in one line, distract
a little from the feeling that it's something that "just happened" instead of
someone actually putting it there. It kinda gives you the slight feeling of
being
watched, if you get what I mean.
I really like it!
Tim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TinCanMan wrote:
> Um... if you used radiosity I would bet dollars to donuts it wasn't rendered
> with v3.1
Why do you say that? Radiosity *is* implemented in POV3.1 you know...
Anyway, you can keep your dollars, I'll have a doughnut. Mmmm,
doughnuts...
--
signature{
"Grey Knight"
contact{ email "gre### [at] yahoocom" }
site_of_week{ url "http://enphilistor.users4.50megs.com/" }
}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"s1631001" <s16### [at] namtarqubacuk> wrote in message
news:3C1### [at] namtarqubacuk...
> TinCanMan wrote:
> > Um... if you used radiosity I would bet dollars to donuts it wasn't
rendered
> > with v3.1
> Why do you say that? Radiosity *is* implemented in POV3.1 you know...
>
> Anyway, you can keep your dollars, I'll have a doughnut. Mmmm,
> doughnuts...
>
Oops! I stand corrected, it's been a while since I used 3.1 and I never used
radiosity in it.
Here's your donut
(OK I'll admit it's more of a reflective torus on a checkered plane but I
didn't have much time)
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Donut.jpg' (42 KB)
Preview of image 'Donut.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
After playing with it for two days, I have to say that I was not able to
make radiosity do what I thought it would do. Although it gave the semblance
of shadows in some situations, it was not really casting shadows as you want
them to do.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
[eats it anyway]
--
signature{
"Grey Knight"
contact{ email "gre### [at] yahoocom" }
site_of_week{ url "http://enphilistor.users4.50megs.com/" }
}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'light_area_test.jpg' (1 KB)
Download 'light_area_test_rad.jpg' (17 KB)
Preview of image 'light_area_test_rad.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
