"s1631001" <s16### [at] namtarqubacuk> wrote in message
news:3C1### [at] namtarqubacuk...
> TinCanMan wrote:
> > Um... if you used radiosity I would bet dollars to donuts it wasn't
rendered
> > with v3.1
> Why do you say that? Radiosity *is* implemented in POV3.1 you know...
>
> Anyway, you can keep your dollars, I'll have a doughnut. Mmmm,
> doughnuts...
>

Oops! I stand corrected, it's been a while since I used 3.1 and I never used
radiosity in it.

Here's your donut
(OK I'll admit it's more of a reflective torus on a checkered plane but I
didn't have much time)

-tgq

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'Donut.jpg' (42 KB)

Preview of image 'Donut.jpg'