In article <3b2da804@news.povray.org>, Mael says...
> ..without post processing> > M>
It looks great, but OTOH, mere drawings are not allowed :)
--
Regards, Sander
AWSOM ROLLEX!
(just kidding...)
"Mael" <Mae### [at] hotmailcom> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3b2da804@news.povray.org...
> ..without post processing>> M>>>
From: Ross Litscher
Subject: Re: B&W.. (105kbu)
Date: 19 Jun 2001 13:04:00
Message: <3b2f8600$1@news.povray.org>
That's really cool. I'd even say artistic :)
Mael <Mae### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3b2da804@news.povray.org...
> ..without post processing>> M>>>
Negative light source? (wait, can you do that?)
Or maybe extreme brilliance values...
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
David Fontaine wrote:
> > Negative light source? (wait, can you do that?)> Or maybe extreme brilliance values...
Probably neither. You just used a really bright spotlight, and the
white/black breaks are where the light is parallel to the surface
normal, right?
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/