 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi all,
a minor update for my random nature pic.
I changed lights, some textures and added or exchanged some plants.
peak mem 669 MB (near collapse)
parse time 3h 17 m
render time (AA0.1) 17 h 5 m
Not very good, but it looks less artificial now.
As JRG in the foregoing thread did I rendered it in 1024*768 to show more
allowed, as you know.
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'irtc-WIP4.jpg' (247 KB)
Preview of image 'irtc-WIP4.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3b252b63@news.povray.org>, Norbert Kern says...
> hi all,
>
> a minor update for my random nature pic.
> I changed lights, some textures and added or exchanged some plants.
>
> peak mem 669 MB (near collapse)
> parse time 3h 17 m
> render time (AA0.1) 17 h 5 m
>
> Not very good, but it looks less artificial now.
> As JRG in the foregoing thread did I rendered it in 1024*768 to show more
> allowed, as you know.
>
> Norbert
>
Man! I find this great!! Stunning, how it seems to be alive!!!
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> a minor update for my random nature pic.
> I changed lights, some textures and added or exchanged some plants.
Very pretty, and a definite improvement on the last image.
> peak mem 669 MB (near collapse)
Ouch! My HDD is groaning just imagining the amount of thrashing that
must have gone on...
> Not very good, but it looks less artificial now.
I beg to differ. At least as far as the first point goes.
> As JRG in the foregoing thread did I rendered it in 1024*768 to show more
> allowed, as you know.
What are you using to do the compression? Some compressors can get
better image quality than others for the same file size.
Bye for now,
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert Kern wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> a minor update for my random nature pic.
> I changed lights, some textures and added or exchanged some plants.
>
The fill light is definitely an improvement, just a bit too strong maybe.
The problem about fill lights is that they light everything equally and
some parts too strong because of that. In megapov you could try to use
light groups for individual lighting of the single trees, but that would
be quite a lot of work.
The texturing looks good, just the shadow on the water looks fairly dark,
it's the darkest area in the whole scene, the grass in the shadow under
the trees should probably be quite similarly dark.
The ferns in the foreground part are not that good IMO, i think with only
the grass it looks better.
> peak mem 669 MB (near collapse)
> parse time 3h 17 m
> render time (AA0.1) 17 h 5 m
How much physical memory does it have?
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Much better than the last. The detail comes out in the trees now.
Norbert Kern wrote:
>
> peak mem 669 MB (near collapse)
> parse time 3h 17 m
> render time (AA0.1) 17 h 5 m
That's it??
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh, mon Dieu! That looks so realistic... Wow...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Great! Very realistic! Love it!
Would it be possible to add dragonflies and/or butterflies?
--
Me (Daniel Lin (dli### [at] yahoocom))
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:33:55 +0200, Norbert Kern wrote:
>hi all,
>
>a minor update for my random nature pic.
>I changed lights, some textures and added or exchanged some plants.
Wow stunning as others have said. The grass could do with considerably
more colour variation, and the same could be said for the leaves of the
trees. Mixed in with all those beautifully green plants and grass you'd
also have some dead leaves and dead grass (at all times of the year).
>peak mem 669 MB (near collapse)
>parse time 3h 17 m
>render time (AA0.1) 17 h 5 m
Still got time for plenty of test renders before the closing date then.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
1:17am up 130 days, 2:07, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.06, 1.03
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Daniel Lin wrote:
>
> Great! Very realistic! Love it!
> Would it be possible to add dragonflies and/or butterflies?
Patience! my friend! Patience! After all, the IRTC theme is "insects
and spiders".
--
Francois Labreque | It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it
flabreque | is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
@ | the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a
videotron.ca | warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in
| motion.
- Stolen from Badger's .sig file
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Norbert Kern" <nor### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> a minor update for my random nature pic. I changed lights, some textures
> and added or exchanged some plants.
>
Only suggestion I can think of right now is to do something about the tree
at the front left - the planar arrangement of the leaves makes it look
somewhat fake from this angle.
The lighting seems good now, although some areas in the background still
look a bit noisy (especially in the shadows).
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg
Home page http://www.hot.ee/margusrt
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
