 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think I'm done. At the higher resolution, you could see some more
samples/intervals were needed, but resized, it looks perfect. Behold 2 years
of work... well, not 2 years of work, but I started toying with this 2 years
ago, and now I'm done... I hope. If anything, I'm waiting to buy my new
computer before doing any more work on this. Enjoy! Oh, and thanks for
rendering this for me, Rick!
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'clouds3_g.jpg' (60 KB)
Preview of image 'clouds3_g.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Real good clouds but I like it a lot better if darker than what I see it as
here. Hopefully I'm not raining on your parade by saying that. They've
come a long way if I'm thinking correctly that this is what had the unwanted
blanking or media cutoff in the distance.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow they are really good.
Do we get to see some code for these? please :)
Dave B
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholic org> wrote in message
news:3ae3212b@news.povray.org...
> I think I'm done. At the higher resolution, you could see some more
> samples/intervals were needed, but resized, it looks perfect. Behold 2
years
> of work... well, not 2 years of work, but I started toying with this 2
years
> ago, and now I'm done... I hope. If anything, I'm waiting to buy my new
> computer before doing any more work on this. Enjoy! Oh, and thanks for
> rendering this for me, Rick!
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Real good clouds
Thanks!
> but
There's always a "but"... <sigh>
> I like it a lot better if darker than what I see it as here.
Oh, darker is easy. Just increase the extinction to taste.
> Hopefully I'm not raining on your parade by saying that.
Luckily, no. :)
> They've come a long way if I'm thinking correctly
> that this is what had the unwanted
> blanking or media cutoff in the distance.
Actually, I eliminate that by using a big box (100000 units both ways on x
and z) and of course, fog.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Wow they are really good.
Thanks! :) Wouldn't have posted them unless they were at least "good".
> Do we get to see some code for these? please :)
I'll be posting it shortly (unless I forget... remind me). You just need to
keep the render time in mind, as well as the fact that at 1600x900 (and less
as well up to a point, I suppose) you can see they need more samples, and
those will slow it down more.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:19:27 -0600, Tony[B] wrote:
>I think I'm done. At the higher resolution, you could see some more
>samples/intervals were needed, but resized, it looks perfect. Behold 2 years
>of work... well, not 2 years of work, but I started toying with this 2 years
>ago, and now I'm done... I hope. If anything, I'm waiting to buy my new
>computer before doing any more work on this. Enjoy! Oh, and thanks for
>rendering this for me, Rick!
Tony these look great, how long did the render take?
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
10:41pm up 79 days, 23:26, 2 users, load average: 1.07, 1.12, 1.05
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Tony these look great, how long did the render take?
As it says on the upper left-hand corner of the image, 8 hours, 31 minutes
and 36 seconds. It may be less than that, because Rick started the render
while he was still using the computer and only set it at highest priority
when he went to bed an hour later.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmm. Yes, these clouds look very good. Congratulations.
Alberto.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks sweet resized down - must admit I had to do this to see it before I
sent it over as my poor ole vid don't do 1600x900 :(
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
Hi-Impact database driven web site design & e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" wrote:
>
> I think I'm done. At the higher resolution, you could see some more
> samples/intervals were needed, but resized, it looks perfect. Behold 2 years
> of work... well, not 2 years of work, but I started toying with this 2 years
> ago, and now I'm done... I hope. If anything, I'm waiting to buy my new
> computer before doing any more work on this. Enjoy! Oh, and thanks for
> rendering this for me, Rick!
>
Wow, impressive, maybe:
- add a nice landscape beneath
- animate it :-)
- show us the code
BTW, does your code allow to structure the clouds somehow like form them
to cloud banks etc. ?
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
