This time I added our logo to the ball and increased the focal blur some rad
settings stayed the same.
This is a pic of a golf ball on the fairway. Well anyway I think I'm going
to work on a motion blur version
if I can get a club made that I like. I tried to copy pane but it didn't
work so I had to capture a pic of the stats. It is jpeged real hard so I'm
sorry about that. Comments welcome.
Buke
buke9 wrote:
> > This time I added our logo to the ball and increased the focal blur some rad> settings stayed the same.> This is a pic of a golf ball on the fairway. Well anyway I think I'm going> to work on a motion blur version> if I can get a club made that I like. I tried to copy pane but it didn't> work so I had to capture a pic of the stats. It is jpeged real hard so I'm> sorry about that. Comments welcome.> > Buke> > [Image]
I am speechless! In a blind taste test, it would be really hard to pick
it out from a series of real pictures.
--
Francois Labreque | Make you a deal, I'll show you mine if you show
flabreque | me yours.
@ |
videotron.ca | - Pandora.
buke9 wrote in message <3ae26300@news.povray.org>...
>This time I added our logo to the ball and increased the focal blur some
rad
>settings stayed the same.>This is a pic of a golf ball on the fairway. Well anyway I think I'm going>to work on a motion blur version>if I can get a club made that I like. I tried to copy pane but it didn't>work so I had to capture a pic of the stats. It is jpeged real hard so I'm>sorry about that. Comments welcome.>>Buke
The dimples on this version of the ball look much better too.
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Grass & Gball Take 3
Date: 22 Apr 2001 14:14:02
Message: <3AE31F74.BE0113F8@gmx.de>
buke9 wrote:
> > This time I added our logo to the ball and increased the focal blur some rad> settings stayed the same.> This is a pic of a golf ball on the fairway. Well anyway I think I'm going> to work on a motion blur version> if I can get a club made that I like. I tried to copy pane but it didn't> work so I had to capture a pic of the stats. It is jpeged real hard so I'm> sorry about that. Comments welcome.>
That really looks quite realistic. I'm not sure, but the radiosity effect
seems quite weak, the lower side of the ball should become a bit more
green and the effect of the (blue) sky could be still stronger on both
grass and ball IMO. Maybe also some (blurred) reflection would be
interesting for the ball.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Grass & Gball Take 3
Date: 23 Apr 2001 18:49:01
Message: <3AE4B065.49B87EB1@faricy.net>
Wow, totally realistic! And only 160 minutes with focal blur and rad!
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/