![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:29:50 -0500, "Patrick Dugan"
<pat### [at] netins net> wrote:
>This got a lot of re-working and could still use some changes but I gave up.
>It uses photons and radiosity to get some nice effects around the glasses
>but the ashtray is a little bright looking. I rendered this in 10240 x 7680
>size which took 5 months to complete. (My wife wanted a large poster so I
>said sure!) Allowing it to render that long was a real pain since I have to
>use the same computer for other stuff. It wasn't turned off but allowed to
>go night and day. Good or bad after that long you can really get tired of
>the same image.
The things people do when on their significant other's request :))
Anyway, it is a really stunning image! The ash looks very similar to
some of the cigars I've smoked (ex. King Edward's) and yet different
from some others (Romeo & Juliet). It probably depends on the way the
machine stuffs the tobacco in there.
5 months... I think it's worth the wait, esp. if you forget about it
after the first few weeks :)
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vip bg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tag povray org
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Very nice image! I like the antique styling and fade at the top, love the deep
deep red tone. Only problem, I would expect the cigar to have a much more matte
finish. Good detail on the ashes tho.
Now render with photons! ;)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <3AD9399F.8526DFD0@faricy.net>, David Fontaine says...
> Very nice image! I like the antique styling and fade at the top, love the deep
> deep red tone. Only problem, I would expect the cigar to have a much more matte
> finish. Good detail on the ashes tho.
>
Yes: the finish on the cigar should be different: now it has IMO a
plastic look. The scene as a whole is very impressive!
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
From: Patrick Dugan
Subject: Re: Cigar, book, glasses and glass...(202k)
Date: 15 Apr 2001 09:16:23
Message: <3ad99f27@news.povray.org>
|
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
It WAS rendered with photons. That's why you can see the flares of light
near the glasses on the desktop.
I debated the cigar finish a long time. Different cigars have different
wrappers and some of mine have a shiny finish while others are matte. I
felt the wrapper does look odd through. The "leaf" just doesn't come across
right.
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricy net> wrote in message
news:3AD9399F.8526DFD0@faricy.net...
> Very nice image! I like the antique styling and fade at the top, love the
deep
> deep red tone. Only problem, I would expect the cigar to have a much more
matte
> finish. Good detail on the ashes tho.
>
> Now render with photons! ;)
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> This got a lot of re-working and could still use some changes but I gave
up.
> It uses photons and radiosity to get some nice effects around the glasses
> but the ashtray is a little bright looking. I rendered this in 10240 x
7680
> size which took 5 months to complete. (My wife wanted a large poster so I
> said sure!) Allowing it to render that long was a real pain since I have
to
> use the same computer for other stuff. It wasn't turned off but allowed
to
> go night and day. Good or bad after that long you can really get tired of
> the same image.
Very very impressive - but 5 months? wow, more patience than i have!
maybe platform independent network rendering is now one of those must have
features...
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
Hi-Impact database driven web site design & e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Stunning image. I like specially the book and the eyeglasses.
Five month for rendering, isn't it a record? I have never heard about
such a long rendering time.
Alberto.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
There seems to be a scale problem and a camera angle problem too.
Time to re render. The cigar texture needs a bit of work, it
doesn't look dry and cracked enough.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
3:02pm up 72 days, 15:47, 2 users, load average: 1.86, 1.49, 1.20
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
From: Patrick Dugan
Subject: Re: Cigar, book, glasses and glass...(202k)
Date: 15 Apr 2001 12:53:29
Message: <3ad9d209@news.povray.org>
|
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
After 5 months I think I'll pass on the re-render.
"Steve" <ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] zero-pps localdomain...
> There seems to be a scale problem and a camera angle problem too.
> Time to re render. The cigar texture needs a bit of work, it
> doesn't look dry and cracked enough.
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net
>
> %HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
>
> web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
>
> or http://start.at/zero-pps
>
> 3:02pm up 72 days, 15:47, 2 users, load average: 1.86, 1.49, 1.20
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Patrick Dugan wrote:
> It WAS rendered with photons. That's why you can see the flares of light
> near the glasses on the desktop.
Ah. Very subtle. I was looking around the ashtray and shot glass and not seeing
caustics.
> I debated the cigar finish a long time. Different cigars have different
> wrappers and some of mine have a shiny finish while others are matte. I
> felt the wrapper does look odd through. The "leaf" just doesn't come across
> right.
I'll take your word. Being underage one would hope I don't know too much about
cigars ;).
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Very inpressive.
Worth the wait ... once.
Patrick Dugan <pat### [at] netins net> wrote in message
news:3ad91619@news.povray.org...
> This got a lot of re-working and could still use some changes but I gave
up.
> It uses photons and radiosity to get some nice effects around the glasses
> but the ashtray is a little bright looking. I rendered this in 10240 x
7680
> size which took 5 months to complete. (My wife wanted a large poster so I
> said sure!) Allowing it to render that long was a real pain since I have
to
> use the same computer for other stuff. It wasn't turned off but allowed
to
> go night and day. Good or bad after that long you can really get tired of
> the same image.
>
>
> Patrick Dugan
> mailto:pat### [at] netins net
> http://showcase.netins.net/web/patrickd
>
>
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |