 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The green one looks pretty good now. =)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That looks like a julia fractal....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen Bell wrote:
>
> Is this going to be part of some bigger scene, or was
> your goal just to make northern lights?
>
Me smells an IRTC wip.
--
Francois Labreque | The surest sign of the existence of extra-
flabreque | terrestrial intelligence is that they never
@ | bothered to come down here and visit us!
videotron.ca | - Calvin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Francois Labreque <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote in message
news:3AC278FD.9752A47D@videotron.ca...
>
>
> Stephen Bell wrote:
> >
> > Is this going to be part of some bigger scene, or was
> > your goal just to make northern lights?
> >
>
> Me smells an IRTC wip.
>
You have a good nose (Although I said as much
in my first post)
Hopefully I'll be able to post a the whole scene
on monday.
Gail
*************************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotixcoza * Step into the abyss, *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * and let go. Babylon 5 *
*************************************************************************
* The difficult we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer *
*************************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen Bell <ste### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:3ac22b03$1@news.povray.org...
> Much nicer (*applause*). The effect is much more subtle, so I think it is
a
> lot more realistic this time around. Would it be possible to have a few
> more, and give it kind of a layered look (although with the techniques
> you're using, that may put the rendering time through the roof)?
Render time is currently about 15 min. That's on a PII 300 render priority
lower and lots of other stuff runing
> It looks a
> lot better not to have the color quite as concentrated around the bottom
> edge. Good show. Is this going to be part of some bigger scene, or was
> your goal just to make northern lights?
>
Going to be part of irtc entry (I hope)
Gail
*************************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotixcoza * Step into the abyss, *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * and let go. Babylon 5 *
*************************************************************************
* The difficult we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer *
*************************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Today's Astronomy Picture of the Day is some awesome aurora.
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
--
Derek Stark
Linux Admin - eSN
dms### [at] esupportnowcom
xt 8952
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"D. Stark - eSN" <dms### [at] esupportnowcom> wrote in message
news:3AC32A66.14D83985@esupportnow.com...
> Today's Astronomy Picture of the Day is some awesome aurora.
>
... with a fractal like shape at the bottom of the pic.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:09:54 +0100, Tom Melly wrote:
>"D. Stark - eSN" <dms### [at] esupportnowcom> wrote in message
>news:3AC32A66.14D83985@esupportnow.com...
>> Today's Astronomy Picture of the Day is some awesome aurora.
>>
>
>... with a fractal like shape at the bottom of the pic.
Those'd be trees. Methinks you need to get out more. :)
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ron Parker" <ron### [at] povrayorg> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] fwicom...
> >
> >... with a fractal like shape at the bottom of the pic.
>
> Those'd be trees. Methinks you need to get out more. :)
>
LOL
Um, ah, I knew that, really, honest. What? Trees aren't fractal?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I saw this picture on the CNN site, thought it might help.
Kirk
"Gail Shaw" <gsh### [at] monotixcoza> wrote in message
news:3ac07177@news.povray.org...
> I decided I needed some atmospheric effects for my
> irtc entry (which I will post once it's more than a few cylinders
> and cones)
>
> This is supposed to be the aurora borealis. It's an isosurface
> containing media with a function used in the density.
>
> For those who live far enough north to see the real thing, does
> it look right?
>
> For the iso experts, is there any way I can randomly vary the
> distance between the peaks of a sine wave?
>
> Comments? suggestions?
>
> Gail
> *************************************************************************
> * gsh### [at] monotixcoza * Step into the abyss, *
> * http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * and let go. Babylon 5 *
> *************************************************************************
> * The difficult we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer *
> *************************************************************************
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'aurora.jpg' (20 KB)
Preview of image 'aurora.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
