POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : HQ-WIP - Photo Realism??? Server Time
19 Aug 2024 02:19:19 EDT (-0400)
  HQ-WIP - Photo Realism??? (Message 5 to 14 of 14)  
<<< Previous 4 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 08:15:07
Message: <chrishuff-24C352.08132702032001@news.povray.org>
In article <3a9f97ae@news.povray.org>, "Rick [Kitty5]" 
<ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote:

> did somebody mumble that it would be impossible to get the tracks to line
> up?

I don't think anybody said anything about trouble lining things up...


> every component modelled (except the activity lights & RJ45 socket), 
> in the exact right place

Looks very photorealistic. There is some radiosity smudging beneath it, 
and the white connector on the right looks odd, but a nice job of 
modelling. The board itself and the markings on the components are 
image_maps, right?

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><


Post a reply to this message

From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 08:29:34
Message: <3A9F9F59.20583CB@videotron.ca>
Nekar Xenos wrote:
> 
> I'm beginning to think it's actually a photo. Unless the code is posted...

I'm still not sure.  The ground has the telltale splotchy color of a
radiosity pic with not enough max_trace_level, but it could just be dirt
on the table, very, very evenly distributed dirt.


> 
> Nekar
> 
> Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote in message
> news:3a9f9928$1@news.povray.org...
> > Wow - is this real? (as in "not real"). The cry of "orsum rolix" is
> shaking
> > the bars of its cage. Amazing. Howdjadoit?
> >
> >
> >

-- 
Francois Labreque | And a four year old carelessly banging on a toy
    flabreque     | piano is not only 'music', it's probably the last
        @         | moment of 'artistic purity' they'll ever enjoy
   videotron.ca   | before outside influences start corrupting their
                  | expression.    - Chris R.


Post a reply to this message

From: Roberto Ferrer de Amorim
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 08:49:55
Message: <3a9fa503@news.povray.org>
Amazing. Great work.

I remember someone saying on this group that it would be nice if some
program could get circuit schematics as entry and output code to render the
circuit board in POV-Ray, with (or without) components included. Maybe you
wanna help? :-)

Wolfox

> did somebody mumble that it would be impossible to get the tracks to line
> up?
>
> every component modelled (except the activity lights & RJ45 socket), in
the
> exact right place
>
> trying for the fabled photo realism :))
>
>
> --
> Rick


Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 08:52:04
Message: <3a9fa584@news.povray.org>
> Um I can't make out the writing. What kind of card is it? Anything I could
> use on my PC? :)

I did a much larger render, but decided to post something smaller till I
have got it finished

its a 3com 3c905b-tx, and this particular card is pointless, it corrupts the
data it sends and recieves and lack of windows crc checking, means you just
get knackered files. hence i have it around..


--
Rick

POV-Ray News & Resources - http://povray.co.uk
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://kitty5.com
Hi-Impact web site design & database driven e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA


Post a reply to this message

From: Harold Baize
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 14:42:17
Message: <3a9ff799$1@news.povray.org>
Great image. Very well done and very realistic. I would like to
quible howerver with the use of the term "photo" realistic.
Photographs are not particularly realistic, and I don't see
artifacts in your image (ie. lens flare) that suggest it was made
with a camera. It is better to strive for real world "realism"
not images as distorted by being captured on film through
a lens. So let me praise you work by saying it is more than
"photo" realistic.

Harold


"Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message
news:3a9f97ae@news.povray.org...
> did somebody mumble that it would be impossible to get the tracks to line
> up?
>
> every component modelled (except the activity lights & RJ45 socket), in
the
> exact right place
>
> trying for the fabled photo realism :))
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 17:10:16
Message: <3AA019D3.1DA8FFCD@faricy.net>
Damn good!
There's some splotchiness though, you should rerender and up the rad settings.
;)

--
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/


Post a reply to this message

From: Xplo Eristotle
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 18:34:09
Message: <3AA02EAF.115666F3@unforgettable.com>
Francois Labreque wrote:
> 
> Nekar Xenos wrote:
> >
> > I'm beginning to think it's actually a photo. Unless the code is posted...
> 
> I'm still not sure.  The ground has the telltale splotchy color of a
> radiosity pic with not enough max_trace_level, but it could just be dirt
> on the table, very, very evenly distributed dirt.

Check the corner of the card. Is that supposed to be a screw?
Something's screaming "image map" to me.

-Xplo


Post a reply to this message

From: Harold Baize
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 19:00:04
Message: <3aa03404@news.povray.org>
Yeah, you're right. It looks flat, but image map doesn't necessarily
mean photo. It could have been a 2D drawing. Still, a screw isn't
that hard to code in POV.

HB

"Xplo Eristotle" <inq### [at] unforgettablecom> wrote in message
news:3AA02EAF.115666F3@unforgettable.com...
> Francois Labreque wrote:
> >
> > Nekar Xenos wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm beginning to think it's actually a photo. Unless the code is
posted...
> >
> > I'm still not sure.  The ground has the telltale splotchy color of a
> > radiosity pic with not enough max_trace_level, but it could just be dirt
> > on the table, very, very evenly distributed dirt.
>
> Check the corner of the card. Is that supposed to be a screw?
> Something's screaming "image map" to me.
>
> -Xplo


Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 21:27:17
Message: <3aa05685@news.povray.org>
> Damn good!
> There's some splotchiness though, you should rerender and up the rad
settings.
> ;)

not doing another rad render till i have the board finished, then i will
have to poach some settings, as i dont fancy playing trial and error with
the render time shooting up as it is.

I have to render on max AA settings as it is or it looks like i have applied
a sharpen post process!


--
Rick

POV-Ray News & Resources - http://povray.co.uk
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://kitty5.com
Hi-Impact web site design & database driven e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA


Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: HQ-WIP - Photo Realism???
Date: 2 Mar 2001 21:58:28
Message: <3aa05dd4@news.povray.org>
> Check the corner of the card. Is that supposed to be a screw?
> Something's screaming "image map" to me.

it is an image map, and did i not say WIP - i still have to add the back
plate


--
Rick

POV-Ray News & Resources - http://povray.co.uk
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://kitty5.com
Hi-Impact web site design & database driven e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 4 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.