 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Are those water drops *supposed* to be star shaped? I suppose so...I
> don't see how that could happen by accident.
well, they effectively are, but actually anyone seems to see that drops draw
things on the table :\ but I know how to correct this ...
> Hmm, the bottle doesn't seem quite right...give it a slight surface
> normal and an ior if it doesn't have one. Wrinkles should give it a bit
> of unevenness, like plastic or glass bottles usually have...you normally
> can't see through them without distortion.
for the wrinkle you're probably right but I don't agree for ior cause the
bottle is a plastic one and it seems to me that there is no distortion with
this material, or am I totally wrong ???
Baillp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> They don't "wet" the paper in way.
yes I've thought at putting water on the real paper sheet I've scanned and
finally didn't do it but it would be easily to make it ...
Baillp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
many thanls I'm gonna try this right now ..
Baillp
3A145146.9718397E@alpharay.de...
> Try this for the water (i have made this finish from scratch...must be
better
> than your actually):
>
> finish {
> phong_size 220
> phong 0.2
> roughness 0.001 file://or try a smaller value
> specular 0.8
> reflection_type 1
> reflection 0.2
> brilliance 3
> }
>
> and the interior:
> interior { ior 1.33 } file://..i think you are using this already
>
> Paul
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3a15b56e$1@news.povray.org>, "Pascal Baillehache"
<bai### [at] free fr> wrote:
> well, they effectively are, but actually anyone seems to see that
> drops draw things on the table :\ but I know how to correct this ...
I noticed some other odd shapes, but they didn't make much
sense...something that looks like a moon to the left, some pretty odd
formations in the back, a pair of "somethings" to the right of the
moon...
> for the wrinkle you're probably right but I don't agree for ior cause
> the bottle is a plastic one and it seems to me that there is no
> distortion with this material, or am I totally wrong ???
You are wrong. Take a bottle and look closely at it: objects seen
through it appear slightly distorted because of the variations in
thickness and surface features. The distortion isn't much because the
material is so thin, but it is definitely there and could give a lot of
dimension to your bottle.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris Huff wrote:
> I noticed some other odd shapes, but they didn't make much
> sense...something that looks like a moon to the left, some pretty odd
> formations in the back, a pair of "somethings" to the right of the
> moon...
I see a palm tree, a star, a bikini, something resembling a fuzzy hat or a
truffle or something (over the word project), and some large fancy
indistinguishable shape in the back.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3A160C29.72B2D0A0@faricy.net>, David Fontaine
<dav### [at] faricynet> wrote:
> I see a palm tree, a star, a bikini, something resembling a fuzzy hat
> or a truffle or something (over the word project), and some large
> fancy indistinguishable shape in the back.
Hmm, if you see a palm tree(I think I see one on the left...my "moon"
was a leaf) and a bikini, the stars are probably starfish. A hat? Maybe
some kind of shell...
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
yes that's it except for the fuzzy hat wich is nothing particular, but I
still admit it isn't really viewable ... the shape in the back is waves, I'm
going to change all of that in the next release
Baillp
> I see a palm tree, a star, a bikini, something resembling a fuzzy hat or a
> truffle or something (over the word project), and some large fancy
> indistinguishable shape in the back.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Hmm, if you see a palm tree(I think I see one on the left...my "moon"
> was a leaf) and a bikini, the stars are probably starfish. A hat? Maybe
> some kind of shell...
as said on the french povray news, it could be a good Rorschach test isn't
it ? ;)
Baillp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Pascal Baillehache wrote:
>
> > They don't "wet" the paper in way.
>
> yes I've thought at putting water on the real paper sheet I've scanned and
> finally didn't do it but it would be easily to make it ...
>
> Baillp
I'm not exactly sure how to model paper that is "wet". I think a
numerical approach to some viscous fluid flowing via capillary action
within a fibre based substance would be required. On the other hand an
exact model is rarely required for artistic purposes and maybe just a
grey region around the water puddle would suffice.
Dennis
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3A187ADB.436E0CA1@interlog.com>, dcl### [at] interlogcom
wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure how to model paper that is "wet". I think a
> numerical approach to some viscous fluid flowing via capillary action
> within a fibre based substance would be required. On the other hand an
> exact model is rarely required for artistic purposes and maybe just a
> grey region around the water puddle would suffice.
In MegaPOV, you could use the "object" pattern to make the areas covered
by water a different color...an exact simulation would definitely be
overkill for this.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
