 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is something i have been working on these days, things turned out to
be very slow again...
The first picture is an early version without photons, but it looks quite
good IMO. It also took 'only' 16 hours.
The second one was the slowest, 4 hours for the photons (although they are
not much visible), 36 hours in total.
The third one is somehow a combination of the first two, quality settings
for both photons and radiosity were quite low, therefore the upper part
looks quite bad. It took 24 hours to render.
What's still missing is different coloring of the stones near and under
water. The versions with photons only have reflective photons, turning
refraction on leads to a visible line here water changes from with to
without photons.
Comments and suggestions welcome as always.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'water_tunnel01.jpg' (47 KB)
Download 'water_tunnel02.jpg' (46 KB)
Download 'water_tunnel03.jpg' (46 KB)
Preview of image 'water_tunnel01.jpg'
Preview of image 'water_tunnel02.jpg'
Preview of image 'water_tunnel03.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
that is very nice. I'd love to see it animated!
:o)
Some of the best water I've seen in awhile.
--
Obscure homebrewed graphics utilities and some
pictures:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi
Looks very nice, although the bricks could use a little dirtying up at the
water line. I was once trying something very similar yet I went for the cave
option, shame I lost the file.
Kev
--
http://perso.libertysurf.co.uk/kevin.ellis
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
very nice work, you have more patience than i :)
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
Hi-Impact database driven web site design & e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I love the water ...
will you share the source ?
thx
Wolfgan
"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3AEC4DE5.818428F7@gmx.de...
>
> This is something i have been working on these days, things turned out to
> be very slow again...
>
> The first picture is an early version without photons, but it looks quite
> good IMO. It also took 'only' 16 hours.
>
> The second one was the slowest, 4 hours for the photons (although they are
> not much visible), 36 hours in total.
>
> The third one is somehow a combination of the first two, quality settings
> for both photons and radiosity were quite low, therefore the upper part
> looks quite bad. It took 24 hours to render.
>
> What's still missing is different coloring of the stones near and under
> water. The versions with photons only have reflective photons, turning
> refraction on leads to a visible line here water changes from with to
> without photons.
>
> Comments and suggestions welcome as always.
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
> IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
> things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
To me it's hard to say which image is the best. They are all great!.
I think i'll keep with the last one because of the stones under the
water. However I prefer the water of the first picture and I think you
should keep the row of bricks at the top of the tunnel (2nd image). I
can see you're making some tests with the stone normal. I think the
normal of the second image is better (surely it takes more time to render).
About the color for the stones, at first I thought about green, but I'm
not sure this will do any good for the image. Some white spots
representing salt accumulation could be added but this doesn't solve
your question.
Alberto.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmm, I like the first best... the second one's too grainy. Maybe smooth the
bricks back a little and keep the photons.
These are awesome!
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dearmad wrote:
>
> that is very nice. I'd love to see it animated!
> :o)
:-)
BTW, RMF water would be quite difficult to animate anyway...
>
> Some of the best water I've seen in awhile.
Thanks.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kevin Ellis wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Looks very nice, although the bricks could use a little dirtying up at the
> water line.
I know, will work on that...
> I was once trying something very similar yet I went for the cave
> option, shame I lost the file.
>
I thought about adding some rocky stuff outside.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick [Kitty5]" wrote:
>
> very nice work, you have more patience than i :)
>
And you have a faster machine than i :-)
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
