"Tek" wrote in message news:3ac50900$1@news.povray.org...
> I work for Codemasters, BTW.

Hey, cool... Another POV-Ray user from Codemasters :-)

--
Jonathan Hunt
http://www.xlcus.co.uk/povray/

ps. Umm, does anyone know  how/if  you can to set followups in
    outlook express?  I can't seem to work it out...

Post a reply to this message

> Well... I was gonna get our head artist to look at your website, but then I
> spotted you were based in the US and I kinda figured you wouldn't be
> interested in moving to the UK. I work for Codemasters, BTW.
>
> Still, if you're interested, I'd be happy to mention you to our people :)

Please do.  At the very least it'll give me an opinion as to if I'm
employable....
:)
Thanks!


H.E. Day
<><

Post a reply to this message

> ps. Umm, does anyone know  how/if  you can to set followups in
>     outlook express?  I can't seem to work it out...

When you reply, go to the menu, select "View | All Headers" and some more
configurable headers should appear.

fup 2 ot

Post a reply to this message

The problem is, the fortress and blimp are, being fictional objects, of
indeterminate size. The ocean and sky are neutral (being limitless for the
purposes of the image) and waterfalls vary in size, and this one is obscured
mostly.

I think you need something to give it scale, the birds are a good clue,
something more apparent is needed. A human figure would be best, or a few,
to do this. At that distance you could use just about anything vaguely human
looking and it would have a good effect. If you don't want to use a human
figure, use something else whose size doesn't vary too much and that is
instantly recognizable.

--
Dan D.

Post a reply to this message

ddombrow wrote:
> 
> The problem is, the fortress and blimp are, being fictional objects, of
> indeterminate size. The ocean and sky are neutral (being limitless for the
> purposes of the image) and waterfalls vary in size, and this one is obscured
> mostly.
> 
> I think you need something to give it scale, the birds are a good clue,
> something more apparent is needed. A human figure would be best, or a few,
> to do this. At that distance you could use just about anything vaguely human
> looking and it would have a good effect. If you don't want to use a human
> figure, use something else whose size doesn't vary too much and that is
> instantly recognizable.

Yes.  Why don't you put a few people on the flight decks.

-- 
Francois Labreque | The surest sign of the existence of extra-
    flabreque     | terrestrial intelligence is that they never
        @         | bothered to come down here and visit us!
  videotron.ca    |                             - Calvin

Post a reply to this message

"Francois Labreque" <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote :
>
> Yes.  Why don't you put a few people on the flight decks.

    At the scale I am imagining, they would only have to be elongated
spheres...

Post a reply to this message

In article <3AC36DED.B12C609D@heday.freeservers.com>, "H.E. Day" 
<The### [at] hedayfreeserverscom> wrote:

> Sigh.  Moving along...

Ignore my last message, I'm catching up on some posts and didn't see the 
latest version.
I like the thruster glows, too bad you can't see it against the 
waterfall. Actually, you might have success graying down the foam...
It still looks a bit like a tower, because you can't see that it is 
unattached at the base.

I don't know what those orange things are...they add a nice touch of 
color, but don't seem to serve a purpose. I'm not sure about the 
patterns on the cloth banners, they make everything appear smaller, and 
they look like blankets and sheets being hung out to dry. They still 
look like they would get roasted by the thrusters on the blimps.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message

epic

"H.E. Day" wrote:


>
> H.E. Day
> <><
>

Post a reply to this message