 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Maybe a craft coming in for a landing...
Nekar
"Jim Kress" <dea### [at] kressworks com> wrote in message
news:3ab59563@news.povray.org...
> > A two headed elephant.
>
> Do we really need a picture of John McCain ruining an otherwise marvelous
> work of art?
>
> :>}
>
> Jim
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How about zeppelins?
"H.E. Day" wrote:
>
> Blimps. Everyone loves blimps, right?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
H.E. Day <The### [at] hedayfreeserverscom> wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding 7bit, 12 lines --]
> Well, got rid of the cave/rocks and just put spray there. To balance
> the image I placed another floating station farther away. Also I added
> more detail to the stations.
> And I fixed the falls. The problem was that the falling water texture
> was simply stretched in the z direction, which caused some weird stuff
> to happen around the edges. I slapped a cylindrical warp on the texture
> and viola!
> Comments? Enjoy!
Ok, the waterfall is much better here. It's much clearer that it's a
circular depression and not a waterfall, now, thanks to the clouds to the
right as well as left.
Like others, I don't like the second station, though someone mentioned
making a second pit, which could be cool. Other than that, everything looks
fabulous.
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Who has noticed (besides me) that the file name ends with 001.
As if it were going to be part of an _animation?_
"H.E. Day" wrote:
>
> Well, got rid of the cave/rocks and just put spray there. To balance
> the image I placed another floating station farther away. Also I added
> more detail to the stations.
> And I fixed the falls. The problem was that the falling water texture
> was simply stretched in the z direction, which caused some weird stuff
> to happen around the edges. I slapped a cylindrical warp on the texture
> and viola!
> Comments? Enjoy!
>
> H.E. Day
> <><
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's still pretty awesome, but the water was better in the last one I think.
The falls look like almost solid vertical bands. I kinda liked it better with
one station. It looks too like this one's gone more towards photorealism from
the flatter modernist painting look you kinda had before. I like it either
way, but realistic is harder to pull off because everything has to be in
place. Right now the falls don't fit.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
