![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
much better :)
i might be tempted to leave it as it is now, maybe add a couple of boats -
or similar craft on the water in the distance to give the impression of
activity
--
Rick
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://povray.co.uk
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://kitty5.com
Hi-Impact web site design & database driven e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"H.E. Day" wrote:
>
> Well. I moved the Fortress in closer and got rid of the docks and
> connecting bridges. A good idea, I think. I also added some rocks off
> to the left to make the water have something to "cascade" around. Looks
> good, I think. Besides the ugly box where the water cascades, I don't
> think I have to do anything more in that area. I also translated the
> clouds 100*z.
> Comments?
>
The right part looks quite optimal now, i'm really looking forward to
seeing a large non-jpg version of that fortress. The forground part looks
ok in the new version too, just a bit more structure in the bright steam
would be good IMO.
For the left side, the 'cave' looks good, but the rectangular structures
need
to be eliminated of course.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chris Huff wrote:
> I liked it better with the docks...even if it wasn't even connected
> physically, it helped fill in the waterfall...
I too liked it better with the docks. They gave the scene balance and
scale. The falls alone just don't cut it.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Geoff Wedig wrote:
> Most people *love* to see what people can achieve with this free little
> program, after all.
Free little program !?! It may be free but it is feature rich and growing
all the time :)
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbell net> wrote:
> Geoff Wedig wrote:
>> Most people *love* to see what people can achieve with this free little
>> program, after all.
> Free little program !?! It may be free but it is feature rich and growing
> all the time :)
Of course, but it's still free, and it isn't bloatware like so many
packages.
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |