POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Santa Fe rolling stock Server Time
19 Aug 2024 04:21:21 EDT (-0400)
  Santa Fe rolling stock (Message 1 to 5 of 5)  
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Santa Fe rolling stock
Date: 7 Jan 2001 18:23:40
Message: <3A58F95B.EC79D45@faricy.net>
The third piece of the train now complete.

I wonder, is the shock control an ad for the real car or just the model?

--
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'lionel3.jpg' (106 KB)

Preview of image 'lionel3.jpg'
lionel3.jpg


 

From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Re: Santa Fe rolling stock
Date: 7 Jan 2001 22:34:09
Message: <3A5934A2.ECE65808@videotron.ca>
David Fontaine wrote:
> 
> The third piece of the train now complete.

Wow! (or should I say woot! woot!)

By the way, the rolling surface of the wheels should very shiny (unless
your car has been sitting there for too long!) as (a) these surfaces are
machined to be perfectly circular and (b) the rolling friction of the
car on the track gets rid of any surface defect that could present
itself.

> 
> I wonder, is the shock control an ad for the real car or just the model?

Dunno.  

-- 
Francois Labreque | Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a snooze
    flabreque     | button on a cat who wants breakfast.
        @         |      - Unattributed quote from rec.humor.funny
   videotron.ca


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Santa Fe rolling stock
Date: 7 Jan 2001 23:52:07
Message: <3A59465F.B0CBD184@faricy.net>
Francois Labreque wrote:

> Wow! (or should I say woot! woot!)
>
> By the way, the rolling surface of the wheels should very shiny (unless
> your car has been sitting there for too long!) as (a) these surfaces are
> machined to be perfectly circular and (b) the rolling friction of the
> car on the track gets rid of any surface defect that could present
> itself.

I know, they're that way on the locomotive. But in RL the cars don't seem to
get that way nearly as much. I think it's the rubbing of the drive wheels that
get it, the cars don't have any forced rubbing.

--
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/


Post a reply to this message

From: Tor Olav Kristensen
Subject: Re: Santa Fe rolling stock
Date: 9 Jan 2001 20:24:38
Message: <3A5BB919.BB77FCB4@online.no>
David Fontaine wrote:
> 
> The third piece of the train now complete.
> ...

These are great !

I really envy your patience.
How many hours does it take to model such a car ?

And when can we expect to see the whole train ?


Tor Olav
-- 
mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Santa Fe rolling stock
Date: 9 Jan 2001 23:29:56
Message: <3A5BE41F.5B12876F@faricy.net>
Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:

> These are great !

tnx!


> I really envy your patience.
> How many hours does it take to model such a car ?

Not sure. 15? The cars were much less work than the loco.


> And when can we expect to see the whole train ?

Well, I can make one with these two cars repeated over and over... I'm
out of boxcars to this scale, but I have two types of tanker, two
hoppers, and two flatbeds I could model. (not all of 'em of course) A
tanker train would be cool, I have 1958 Gulf Oil nad 1992 MKT (both
Lionel).

--
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.