 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It has been ressurected.
http://davidf.faricy.net/raygall.html
http://davidf.faricy.net/renders/userdskm.jpg
I made it small enough to be illegible. And yes, the 3200x2400 version
is still around on my HD. :)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is getting so big and so hard to read, I wonder if it can't be made
into a slow animation of the disk spinning, so we can see all the rows in
a thing column spinning around...loopable, of course..
Josh
David Fontaine wrote:
> It has been ressurected.
>
> http://davidf.faricy.net/raygall.html
> http://davidf.faricy.net/renders/userdskm.jpg
>
> I made it small enough to be illegible. And yes, the 3200x2400 version
> is still around on my HD. :)
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
--
Josh English -- Lexiphanic Lethomaniac
eng### [at] spiritonecom
The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Or have 1 disc per country. I'd get my very own... hehe... :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I am happy to see that it is still kept somewhere.
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> It has been ressurected.
>
> http://davidf.faricy.net/raygall.html
> http://davidf.faricy.net/renders/userdskm.jpg
>
> I made it small enough to be illegible. And yes, the 3200x2400 version
> is still around on my HD. :)
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Josh English wrote:
> This is getting so big and so hard to read, I wonder if it can't be made
> into a slow animation of the disk spinning, so we can see all the rows in
> a thing column spinning around...loopable, of course..
It hasn't changed since I last posted it way back when. There is a 3200x2400
jpg version that is readable that I posted a loooong time ago.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mr. Art" wrote:
> I am happy to see that it is still kept somewhere.
Thanks! Should I upload the 3200x2400 and post a link? (Not linked to from
my site of course)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
When I tried animating it that way, rotating the camera around and spiralling
inward (or was it outward? no matter) the file size was going to be pretty big
to make it readable. Mpeg compression artifacts messed with it and it had to
move slowly.
It could be done I suppose, just would be a hefty file to D/L. Unless someone
else has come up with a better way.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bob H." wrote:
> When I tried animating it that way, rotating the camera around and spiralling
> inward (or was it outward? no matter) the file size was going to be pretty big
> to make it readable. Mpeg compression artifacts messed with it and it had to
> move slowly.
> It could be done I suppose, just would be a hefty file to D/L. Unless someone
> else has come up with a better way.
The full image is of course more efficient, only 688k :)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
