"Bob H." wrote:

> When I tried animating it that way, rotating the camera around and spiralling
> inward (or was it outward? no matter) the file size was going to be pretty big
> to make it readable.  Mpeg compression artifacts messed with it and it had to
> move slowly.
> It could be done I suppose, just would be a hefty file to D/L.  Unless someone
> else has come up with a better way.

The full image is of course more efficient, only 688k :)

--
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

Post a reply to this message