 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> Just something I've been playing around with. This isn't meant to
> perfectly emulate any specific kind of plant, though it does rather
> resemble yucca. I'll probably make this into a real scene eventually.
I like cacti and succulents, have a little pot (more like dish or platter) of
six of 'em in my room :)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> Xplo Eristotle wrote:
>
> > Just something I've been playing around with. This isn't meant to
> > perfectly emulate any specific kind of plant, though it does rather
> > resemble yucca. I'll probably make this into a real scene eventually.
>
> I like cacti and succulents, have a little pot (more like dish or platter) of
> six of 'em in my room :)
I used to have a little one in a pot velcroed to the top of my car's
dashboard. It lived for years on coffee dregs and an occassional bit of
coke. And the looks it would get were worth every penny of the $2 it
cost. If I could have managed a camera I would have a great collection
of pedestrian double-takes at crosswalks.
--
I am not pro-slavery, just pro-choice.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 105
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matt Giwer wrote:
> I used to have a little one in a pot velcroed to the top of my car's
> dashboard. It lived for years on coffee dregs and an occassional bit of
> coke. And the looks it would get were worth every penny of the $2 it
> cost. If I could have managed a camera I would have a great collection
> of pedestrian double-takes at crosswalks.
Cool. Yeah, those cacti are tough.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 14:47:59 +0100, Remco de Korte wrote:
>It appears this also called a yucca, so disregard my previous comment.
>
>BTW I've seen these in bloom (?).
I thought everything that grew in Holand had flowrs, so why were
you surprised?
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
8:26am up 61 days, 10:51, 3 users, load average: 1.24, 1.08, 1.02
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thes eplants will rot here before then can get flowers. That is, outdoors.
Indoors you'd need a high ceiling. The question mark was because I wasn't sure I
used the right frase/word/term (here I go again).
Remco
Steve wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 14:47:59 +0100, Remco de Korte wrote:
> >It appears this also called a yucca, so disregard my previous comment.
> >
> >BTW I've seen these in bloom (?).
>
> I thought everything that grew in Holand had flowrs, so why were
> you surprised?
>
> --
> Cheers
> Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
>
> %HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
>
> web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
>
> or http://start.at/zero-pps
>
> 8:26am up 61 days, 10:51, 3 users, load average: 1.24, 1.08, 1.02
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in povray.binaries.images, Xplo Eristotle says...
> Just something I've been playing around with. This isn't meant to
> perfectly emulate any specific kind of plant, though it does rather
> resemble yucca. I'll probably make this into a real scene eventually.
>
I wonder why you post your JPG as a progressive type and not as a
straight type? First image I posted was progressive and nearly everybody
fell over me :-(
BTW it is nice and life-like, I wouldn't want to cut myself with it :)
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sander wrote:
>
> I wonder why you post your JPG as a progressive type and not as a
> straight type? First image I posted was progressive and nearly everybody
> fell over me :-(
Progressive is smaller, and no one ever gave me any trouble over it.. if
it's a problem, someone let me know, and I'll turn it off.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in povray.binaries.images, Xplo Eristotle says...
> Sander wrote:
>
> Progressive is smaller, and no one ever gave me any trouble over it.. if
> it's a problem, someone let me know, and I'll turn it off.
The standard viewer of my newsreader doesn't accept progressive jpg's; I
have to resort to another one. But if I'm the only one: don't bother...
I'll do that.
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sander wrote:
>
> in povray.binaries.images, Xplo Eristotle says...
> > Sander wrote:
> >
> > Progressive is smaller, and no one ever gave me any trouble over it.. if
> > it's a problem, someone let me know, and I'll turn it off.
>
> The standard viewer of my newsreader doesn't accept progressive jpg's; I
> have to resort to another one. But if I'm the only one: don't bother...
> I'll do that.
Ah, no need. It's only a small reduction in filesize anyway; I'll turn
it off.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in povray.binaries.images, Xplo Eristotle says...
>
> Ah, no need. It's only a small reduction in filesize anyway; I'll turn
> it off.
>
> -Xplo
>
Thanks. This viewer of my reader is not a great thing, so...
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
