 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I lied!
I guess at one time or another everyone has done an earth image. Here's
mine. :)
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'newearth.jpg' (27 KB)
Preview of image 'newearth.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This may be a duplicate reply (or maybe I sent my original reply to your
email address, Mike - Netscape Messenger makes it easy to do that
accidentally), but I notice that the atmosphere scale height seems to be too
high (the atmosphere seems to thick) in these renderings of the earth which
include atmosphere.
Jon
"MikeH" <Ama### [at] aol com> wrote in message
news:3A2DE193.6351F315@aol.com...
> I lied!
>
> I guess at one time or another everyone has done an earth image. Here's
> mine. :)
>
> -Mike
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I notice that the atmosphere scale height seems to be too
> high (the atmosphere seems to thick) in these renderings of the earth which
> include atmosphere.
Most definitely. It's just artistical license.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
MikeH wrote:
> Most definitely. It's just artistical license.
Artistical license ?
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Artistical license ?
Correctomundo!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3a2e55ff@news.povray.org>, "Jon Berndt" <jsb### [at] hal-pcorg>
wrote:
> but I notice that the atmosphere scale height seems to be too high
> (the atmosphere seems to thick)
Maybe...but I think the problem is more that it seems to be constant
density, instead of fading out with distance. There is a little bit of
fading, but I can't tell if it is from the density or because of the
difference in the amount of atmosphere you see through.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think Walt Disney invented it
Ken wrote:
> MikeH wrote:
>
> > Most definitely. It's just artistical license.
>
> Artistical license ?
>
> --
> Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Earth with air you can see anyhow.
A truer atmosphere is abysmal to see so these exaggerated kind are all the
better.
I almost thought you had used multiple lights for the sunshine judging by the
wrap-around then I realized it's an illusion caused by the forward and back
extensions of media shell. If you understand me.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I almost thought you had used multiple lights for the sunshine judging by the
> wrap-around then I realized it's an illusion caused by the forward and back
> extensions of media shell. If you understand me.
I understand what you mean. That's what makes the unrealitic atmosphere so
obvious. What would be better is a thinner atmosphere with a closer view of the
earth, like a space view horizon shot.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 10:46:37 -0800 Ken wrote:
>Artistical license ?
I'm not touching this one... <g>
--
Alan - ako### [at] povrayorg - a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
