 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm fairly satisfied with this :)
Each torch is a column of three (for small "stick") or six (for large
"lantern") point lights with a yellowish tint. If you look closely (at
least on the PNG version) the banding is evident, but it blends pretty
well. Because of the number of lights (42) and the high aa (0.1, even
0.2 left nasty artifacts on the daylight version if you look closely) it
took a long time to render...
Render time 1d 07h 29m 04s (31:29:04)
Peak memory 55 873 443
This is a very black-level sensitive image, so if you can't make out
details in the dimly lit areas turn off the room lights or shield your
monitor, trust me it looks a lot better!
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'castle_699_2.jpg' (123 KB)
Preview of image 'castle_699_2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Time to change the wallpaper, thanks David.
>Render time 1d 07h 29m 04s (31:29:04)
>Peak memory 55 873 443
You whimp! That's less than a week:-)
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
4:05am up 29 days, 6:27, 3 users, load average: 2.17, 1.56, 1.21
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> I'm fairly satisfied with this :)
>
> Each torch is a column of three (for small "stick") or six (for large
> "lantern") point lights with a yellowish tint. If you look closely (at
> least on the PNG version) the banding is evident, but it blends pretty
> well. Because of the number of lights (42) and the high aa (0.1, even
> 0.2 left nasty artifacts on the daylight version if you look closely) it
> took a long time to render...
That looks badass. My only complaint would be that the camera makes it
look a bit strange.
> This is a very black-level sensitive image, so if you can't make out
> details in the dimly lit areas turn off the room lights or shield your
> monitor, trust me it looks a lot better!
Not a problem on a Mac. ;)
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> > This is a very black-level sensitive image, so if you can't make out
> > details in the dimly lit areas turn off the room lights or shield your
> > monitor, trust me it looks a lot better!
>
> Not a problem on a Mac. ;)
I hardly see how glare and black-level can be platform dependent...
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Steve wrote:
> Time to change the wallpaper, thanks David.
:)) The highest honor one can recieve!
> >Render time 1d 07h 29m 04s (31:29:04)
> >Peak memory 55 873 443
>
> You whimp! That's less than a week:-)
;) Alright, I'll radiositize and photonize it (j/k)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> That looks badass.
The banding?
> My only complaint would be that the camera makes it look a bit strange.
That's a matter of personal taste; I kinda like the ultra_wide_angle camera.
:)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3A0A3E34.BCFBD663@faricy.net>, David Fontaine
<dav### [at] faricynet> wrote:
> > Not a problem on a Mac. ;)
>
> I hardly see how glare and black-level can be platform dependent...
Macs have a different gamma(around 1.8), so the darker areas show up as
brighter on Macs. I could see nearly every detail in even the darkest
areas on my system(though it retains the dimly-lit look).
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> I'm fairly satisfied with this :)
>
> Each torch is a column of three (for small "stick") or six (for large
> "lantern") point lights with a yellowish tint. If you look closely (at
> least on the PNG version) the banding is evident, but it blends pretty
> well. Because of the number of lights (42) and the high aa (0.1, even
> 0.2 left nasty artifacts on the daylight version if you look closely) it
> took a long time to render...
>
> Render time 1d 07h 29m 04s (31:29:04)
> Peak memory 55 873 443
>
The lighting looks nice but not very lego-like(tm)
How about a second version with bright sky, radiosity, some reflection ?
Ok, you should then leave out the 42 light sources to get it rendered within one
week ;-)
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
With this lighting I am reminded of a quake map. Very cool.
Josh
David Fontaine wrote:
> I'm fairly satisfied with this :)
>
> Each torch is a column of three (for small "stick") or six (for large
> "lantern") point lights with a yellowish tint. If you look closely (at
> least on the PNG version) the banding is evident, but it blends pretty
> well. Because of the number of lights (42) and the high aa (0.1, even
> 0.2 left nasty artifacts on the daylight version if you look closely) it
> took a long time to render...
>
> Render time 1d 07h 29m 04s (31:29:04)
> Peak memory 55 873 443
>
> This is a very black-level sensitive image, so if you can't make out
> details in the dimly lit areas turn off the room lights or shield your
> monitor, trust me it looks a lot better!
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
--
Josh English -- Lexiphanic Lethomaniac
eng### [at] spiritonecom
The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This image makes me want to construct with
Lego again !
But isn't there a tiny detail missing ?
The word "Lego" on every little "cylinder".
Nice idea to use a wide angled camera here.
This combined with the dim light spots
shows the Lego bricks(?) in a way that I
have never seen them before.
Tor Olav
--
mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
