POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Do I relly need a raytracer... Server Time
4 Nov 2024 17:35:03 EST (-0500)
  Do I relly need a raytracer... (Message 1 to 10 of 13)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 3 Messages >>>
From: Karl Pelzer
Subject: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 11 Sep 2000 15:35:11
Message: <39BD3430.C86845E5@t-online.de>
...to make such images? Surely not. But it's fun.
Thanks go out to:
- H.E. Day for his ideas on 'find_edges' post processing
- Chis Colefax for his Spray include and Clock modifier macro file

Of course there is an animation but I think it's too large to post it
here and I've no homepage yet (too much raytracing!).

To Chris Colefax: some of the pink bubbles pop away when having crossed
the right border half way. I guess you do a visibility test in your
Spray include to create only those object which are visible. Right?

To all others: I'm looking fo a font in 'Austin Powers' style or kind of
60's style that fits the mood.

Karl


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'rotate.jpg' (24 KB)

Preview of image 'rotate.jpg'
rotate.jpg


 

From: Josh English
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 11 Sep 2000 16:39:09
Message: <39BD42F2.BF4A0EBE@spiritone.com>
I have to admit, I'm hard pressed to not beleive that this was rendered in
POV-Ray. It really looks like Adobe Illustrator. Of course this is a
compliment.

Josh English

Karl Pelzer wrote:

> ...to make such images? Surely not. But it's fun.
> Thanks go out to:
> - H.E. Day for his ideas on 'find_edges' post processing
> - Chis Colefax for his Spray include and Clock modifier macro file
>
> Of course there is an animation but I think it's too large to post it
> here and I've no homepage yet (too much raytracing!).
>
> To Chris Colefax: some of the pink bubbles pop away when having crossed
> the right border half way. I guess you do a visibility test in your
> Spray include to create only those object which are visible. Right?
>
> To all others: I'm looking fo a font in 'Austin Powers' style or kind of
> 60's style that fits the mood.
>
> Karl
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

--
Josh English -- Lexiphanic Lethomaniac
eng### [at] spiritonecom
The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/


Post a reply to this message

From: Alan Holding
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 11 Sep 2000 18:22:43
Message: <39bd5b33@news.povray.org>
Karl Pelzer <Kar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:39BD3430.C86845E5@t-online.de...

> To all others: I'm looking fo a font in 'Austin Powers' style or kind of
> 60's style that fits the mood.
>

Try www.fontsnthings.com or Ray Larabie's www.larabiefonts.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Richard Morton
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 12 Sep 2000 07:45:25
Message: <39BE6C63.E984D84C@hotmail.removethisbit.com>
I assume that Blubber is meant to be an anagram of Bubbler or is there some
other significance to the word ?


Post a reply to this message

From: Karl Pelzer
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 12 Sep 2000 12:27:48
Message: <39BE59C4.473360CF@t-online.de>
Richard Morton wrote:
> 
> I assume that Blubber is meant to be an anagram of Bubbler or is there some
> other significance to the word ?

'Blubber' is the German 'comic noise' for bubbling fluids. So Bubbler is
not so far away from it ;-)

Karl


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 13 Sep 2000 22:09:01
Message: <slrn8s0di7.1tl.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 21:36:16 +0200, Karl Pelzer wrote:
>To all others: I'm looking fo a font in 'Austin Powers' style or kind of
>60's style that fits the mood.

The canonical "70s" font is Bocklin (sometimes spelled Boecklin)

-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.


Post a reply to this message

From: Karl Pelzer
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 14 Sep 2000 09:43:46
Message: <39C0D655.58E3951A@t-online.de>
Thanks Ron!

But I wasn't able to find it (yet)

Karl


Post a reply to this message

From: Karl Pelzer
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 14 Sep 2000 09:59:13
Message: <39C0D9F4.4A5DAF63@t-online.de>
Ron Parker wrote:

> The canonical "70s" font is Bocklin (sometimes spelled Boecklin)

I just saw on Ray Larabies web site that this font isn't free. And I've
no software it is associated with. 8-[

Karl


Post a reply to this message

From: Christophe Bouffartigue
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 14 Sep 2000 10:08:50
Message: <39C0DBF1.E5D68263@nanterre.marelli.fr>
Karl Pelzer wrote:
> 
> Ron Parker wrote:
> 
> > The canonical "70s" font is Bocklin (sometimes spelled Boecklin)
> 
> I just saw on Ray Larabies web site that this font isn't free. And I've
> no software it is associated with. 8-[
> 
> Karl

Look at http://www.fontaddict.com/archive.html and search for "Action"
font (freeware), maybe this one could suit yours needs...

Bouf.


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 14 Sep 2000 10:26:27
Message: <slrn8s1omm.244.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:00:20 +0200, Karl Pelzer wrote:
>Ron Parker wrote:
>
>> The canonical "70s" font is Bocklin (sometimes spelled Boecklin)
>
>I just saw on Ray Larabies web site that this font isn't free. And I've
>no software it is associated with. 8-[

http://bibliofile.mc.duke.edu/gww/fonts/Bocklin/Bocklin.html

-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 3 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.