From: Karl Pelzer
Subject: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 11 Sep 2000 15:35:11
Message: <39BD3430.C86845E5@t-online.de>
...to make such images? Surely not. But it's fun.
Thanks go out to:
- H.E. Day for his ideas on 'find_edges' post processing
- Chis Colefax for his Spray include and Clock modifier macro file
Of course there is an animation but I think it's too large to post it
here and I've no homepage yet (too much raytracing!).
To Chris Colefax: some of the pink bubbles pop away when having crossed
the right border half way. I guess you do a visibility test in your
Spray include to create only those object which are visible. Right?
To all others: I'm looking fo a font in 'Austin Powers' style or kind of
60's style that fits the mood.
Karl
From: Josh English
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 11 Sep 2000 16:39:09
Message: <39BD42F2.BF4A0EBE@spiritone.com>
I have to admit, I'm hard pressed to not beleive that this was rendered in
POV-Ray. It really looks like Adobe Illustrator. Of course this is a
compliment.
Josh English
Karl Pelzer wrote:
> ...to make such images? Surely not. But it's fun.> Thanks go out to:> - H.E. Day for his ideas on 'find_edges' post processing> - Chis Colefax for his Spray include and Clock modifier macro file>> Of course there is an animation but I think it's too large to post it> here and I've no homepage yet (too much raytracing!).>> To Chris Colefax: some of the pink bubbles pop away when having crossed> the right border half way. I guess you do a visibility test in your> Spray include to create only those object which are visible. Right?>> To all others: I'm looking fo a font in 'Austin Powers' style or kind of> 60's style that fits the mood.>> Karl>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------> [Image]
--
Josh English -- Lexiphanic Lethomaniac
eng### [at] spiritonecom
The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/
From: Alan Holding
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 11 Sep 2000 18:22:43
Message: <39bd5b33@news.povray.org>
Karl Pelzer <Kar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:39BD3430.C86845E5@t-online.de...
> To all others: I'm looking fo a font in 'Austin Powers' style or kind of> 60's style that fits the mood.>
Try www.fontsnthings.com or Ray Larabie's www.larabiefonts.com
From: Karl Pelzer
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 12 Sep 2000 12:27:48
Message: <39BE59C4.473360CF@t-online.de>
Richard Morton wrote:
> > I assume that Blubber is meant to be an anagram of Bubbler or is there some> other significance to the word ?
'Blubber' is the German 'comic noise' for bubbling fluids. So Bubbler is
not so far away from it ;-)
Karl
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 21:36:16 +0200, Karl Pelzer wrote:
>To all others: I'm looking fo a font in 'Austin Powers' style or kind of>60's style that fits the mood.
The canonical "70s" font is Bocklin (sometimes spelled Boecklin)
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
From: Karl Pelzer
Subject: Re: Do I relly need a raytracer...
Date: 14 Sep 2000 09:59:13
Message: <39C0D9F4.4A5DAF63@t-online.de>
Ron Parker wrote:
> The canonical "70s" font is Bocklin (sometimes spelled Boecklin)
I just saw on Ray Larabies web site that this font isn't free. And I've
no software it is associated with. 8-[
Karl
Karl Pelzer wrote:
> > Ron Parker wrote:> > > The canonical "70s" font is Bocklin (sometimes spelled Boecklin)> > I just saw on Ray Larabies web site that this font isn't free. And I've> no software it is associated with. 8-[> > Karl
Look at http://www.fontaddict.com/archive.html and search for "Action"
font (freeware), maybe this one could suit yours needs...
Bouf.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:00:20 +0200, Karl Pelzer wrote:
>Ron Parker wrote:>>> The canonical "70s" font is Bocklin (sometimes spelled Boecklin)>>I just saw on Ray Larabies web site that this font isn't free. And I've>no software it is associated with. 8-[
http://bibliofile.mc.duke.edu/gww/fonts/Bocklin/Bocklin.html
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.