 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Actually I don't think it's too bad as is, excepting the no AA. The ground
could definitely use a change though, looks either like a manicured lawn or
raked gravel. If there were small to large variations it would be better.
Oh, and some rocks encircling the fire too.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Is the army Roman or Greek? Or am I totally of base and its the army from
Fictionia?
Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
> I'm not really satisfied with this one, jet, but can't put my fingers on it.
> No AA yet and only poor radiosity settings. It is again quite dark (Jpeg
> seems to make it even darker - oh no! it is the white browser background),
> so look at it with a warmed up monitor, on gray or black and/or in a dark
> room - there is another tree in the background on the right ;-)
> Some input would be very appreciated.
>
> Marc-Hendrik
>
> Credits:
> Peter Houston for the Blobman
> Gilles Tran for the tree macro
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: Lagerfeuer - WIP.jpeg
> Lagerfeuer - WIP.jpeg Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
> Encoding: base64
--
"Yub-Yub!" Lt. Kettch
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lt. Kettch schrieb in Nachricht <39683928.DC239D63@aol.com>...
>Is the army Roman or Greek? Or am I totally of base and its the army from
>Fictionia?
>
It is supposed to be the elite of my Free Republic of Aragan - which is
totally fictional. I think they could not stand the comparison with any
real life ancient army.
Marc-Hendrik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, the ground. It is made of Hf-tiles from a grass-picture with an
image-map of grass. I'll have to choose another way, I think.
Thanks,
Marc-Hendrik
Bob Hughes schrieb in Nachricht <3967af1d@news.povray.org>...
>Actually I don't think it's too bad as is, excepting the no AA. The ground
>could definitely use a change though, looks either like a manicured lawn or
>raked gravel. If there were small to large variations it would be better.
>Oh, and some rocks encircling the fire too.
>
>Bob
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There is already a 'Moon'-lightsource behind the camera, but I agree it has
to be a bit brighter ;-)
Marc-Hendrik
Xplo Eristotle schrieb in Nachricht <3967A946.69C70782@unforgettable.com>...
>
>A little moonlight might look good.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks. I'll make my fill light's a bit brighter, that should work.
Marc-Hendrik
David Fontaine schrieb in Nachricht <3967A4EF.300BB72A@faricy.net>...
>Ooh, cool, but awfully dark in the shadows. Maybe some higher ambient?
>
>--
>David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
>Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Brighness is OK on a calibrated gamma 2.2 (sRGB) monitor.
I would try cold blue light up and behind the scene.
K.K.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I don't understand this Gamma stuff very well. So I would like to ask some
questions.
My Monitor has Gamma 1.55 (or that is what Picture Publisher tells me) -
does this mean, that the Pic is brighter on your screen? Or does it mean you
see it the way I do, 'cause I rendered it with assumed_gamma 1.55? When I
raise gamma in PP to 2.2 it is much to bright. The colored stripes on the
tents are easily to recognize and quite bright with 2.2 .. hm, as I think
about it, you would not say the brightness is okay if you would see it this
way. In fact all those ugly details show up (I have to rework those boots!).
The lighting remains difficult because it changes dramatically dependent on
the use of radiosity, the color and structure of the ground and so on. A lot
of trial and error.
Marc-Hendrik
Default User schrieb in Nachricht <3968C82D.4E9B3230@computer.net>...
>
>Brighness is OK on a calibrated gamma 2.2 (sRGB) monitor.
>I would try cold blue light up and behind the scene.
>
>
>K.K.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Actualy I think the darkness of the scene give it a more realistic look.
Seems to fit the mode of the scene better.
Ken Matassa
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
After some gamma correction this looks fine. A few things that I will mention
are that the grass clumps seem to be set out in a very uniform fashion, try
to get a bit of randomness into it, also the scene has an indoors feel to it,
probably because the sky is so dark, and there doesn't appear to be any moon
light shining on anything.
Nice work.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
6:51pm up 11 days, 18:32, 2 users, load average: 1.15, 1.05, 1.01
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
