 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Stargate (10124x768, 148 KB) - stargate.jpg (1/1)
Date: 27 Jun 2000 15:26:15
Message: <3958ffd7@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jeff Lee" <shi### [at] gate net> wrote in message
news:3958eb77.8512606@news.povray.org...
| "Bob Hughes" <per### [at] aolcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote:
| >
| > A beaut of a model/scene/render. The lights on the walls don't seem to
| > illuminate the nearest region of wall they are attached to, which might be
a
| > case of texture-tweaking and light fade tweaking.
|
| Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why that's happening. When I do a test
| render with point lights rather than area_lights, they illuminate the
| walls better.
Possibly self shadowing of the light fixture, but most likely is that because
each point in the array is reduced in brightness in order to remain at the
original point source intensity. Why that would actually dim the local area
more might have something to do with what can be seen by using multiple point
lights and using a sum total of greater than 1 to achieve the same brightness
as a single rgb 1 light source.
Just speculation, of course.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:19:27 -0700, Josh English wrote...
> The ones on the turning ring are the only ones I can see. I thought the
> movie called them cartouches. It's been a while since I've seen the movie.
AFAIR, a cartouche is a collection of glyphs, somewhat analogous to a
signature.
And I think the movie called them 'symbols', but the resident smartarse
egyptologist had to decode a tablet with cartouches engraved onto it.
It's also been a while since I saw the movie, so take anything I say with
a reasonably large pinch of NaCl. :)
Bye for now,
Jamie
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Sander
Subject: Re: Stargate (10124x768, 148 KB) - stargate.jpg (0/1)
Date: 27 Jun 2000 16:34:52
Message: <39590fec@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you very much!
--
Regards, Sander
-----------------------------
Jeff Lee <shi### [at] gatenet> schreef in berichtnieuws
3958e5e1.7082798@news.povray.org...
>
> Here's what I used (well, I've cleaned it up a bit for readability):
>
<snip>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow... That's impressive. I just happen to have the video of that
movie.
Brendan Ryan
Jeff Lee wrote:
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Sander
Subject: Re: Stargate (10124x768, 148 KB) - stargate.jpg (0/1)
Date: 28 Jun 2000 14:24:57
Message: <395a42f9@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jeff: I printed your Stargate.jpg on my brand new hp1220c printer and I was
even more impressed by your creation than before! Great!!
--
Regards, Sander
-----------------------------
Jeff Lee <shi### [at] gatenet> schreef in berichtnieuws
3958e5e1.7082798@news.povray.org...
>
> Here's what I used (well, I've cleaned it up a bit for readability):
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:08:14 GMT, shi### [at] gatenet (Jeff Lee) wrote:
[ Stargate ]
Wow, that looks like an H.E. Day! :-)
--
Marc van den Dikkenberg
--
The PowerBasic Archives -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~excel/pb.html
All Basic Code Archives -- http://come.to/abcpackets
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: ryan constantine
Subject: Re: Stargate (10124x768, 148 KB) - stargate.jpg (0/1)
Date: 29 Jun 2000 06:14:23
Message: <395B2108.67E72257@yahoo.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
isn't that printer the new big brother to the relatively new 970? i
think the only difference is paper size. i think yours prints like 11
by 17 or something? i have the 970, and i must say this batch of new
printers from hp is impressive, isn't it?
Sander wrote:
>
> Jeff: I printed your Stargate.jpg on my brand new hp1220c printer and I was
> even more impressed by your creation than before! Great!!
>
> --
> Regards, Sander
> -----------------------------
>
> Jeff Lee <shi### [at] gatenet> schreef in berichtnieuws
> 3958e5e1.7082798@news.povray.org...
> >
> > Here's what I used (well, I've cleaned it up a bit for readability):
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is excelent. Some really good texturing and some nice
nondescript objects that make it look so real. Thanks for
sharing.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
12:57am up 38 min, 2 users, load average: 1.30, 1.34, 1.13
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Sander
Subject: Re: Stargate (10124x768, 148 KB) - stargate.jpg (0/1)
Date: 30 Jun 2000 05:36:08
Message: <395c6a08@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It surely is! I amaze everybody in my vicinity with the beautiful pictures
it prints. Now I *must* render something worthwhile myself, oh oh!
--
Regards, Sander
-----------------------------
ryan constantine <rco### [at] yahoocom> schreef in berichtnieuws
395B2108.67E72257@yahoo.com...
> isn't that printer the new big brother to the relatively new 970? i
> think the only difference is paper size. i think yours prints like 11
> by 17 or something? i have the 970, and i must say this batch of new
> printers from hp is impressive, isn't it?
>
> Sander wrote:
> >
> > Jeff: I printed your Stargate.jpg on my brand new hp1220c printer and I
was
> > even more impressed by your creation than before! Great!!
> >
> > --
> > Regards, Sander
> > -----------------------------
> >
> > Jeff Lee <shi### [at] gatenet> schreef in berichtnieuws
> > 3958e5e1.7082798@news.povray.org...
> > >
> > > Here's what I used (well, I've cleaned it up a bit for readability):
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Alberto
Subject: Re: Stargate (10124x768, 148 KB) - stargate.jpg (0/1)
Date: 1 Jul 2000 17:59:23
Message: <395E6836.A36E62F5@usb.ve>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jeff Lee wrote:
>
> I know it's still missing a couple of details, but it's not too bad, I
> think.
>
> Rendered with unofficial OS/2 PM compile of 3.1g Linux sources.
>
> --
> Jeff Lee shi### [at] gatenet http://www.gate.net/~shipbrk/
I love this scene. I'm impressed with the realism you achieved in this scene.
Alberto.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
