 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
oh just a weensy bit phalic arent you?
Ian Burgmyer wrote:
> Here's a new version of my missile image, originally posted 4/27/1999. It
> is quite a bit different and much better then the last one (take it from me)
> ;-)
>
> Anyways, please tell me what you think! It's been a while since I've posted
> anything here :-)
>
> --
> This message brought to you by:
> -=< Ian (the### [at] hotmail com >=-
>
> Please visit my site at http://www.spectere.com! :-)
> --
>
> P.S. This was compressed at 80% JPEG compression and still looks good. Just
> as a reference... :-D
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ian Burgmyer" <the### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:39480f27@news.povray.org...
| "Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
| news:3947FC3E.C6B934B9@gmx.de...
| > Ok, the lens flare itself is not bad, it's just that something seems
| > missing.
|
| Dad suggested that the lens flare is a little inaccurate, and I agree with
| his reasons. He says that at an angle like that, the rings wouldn't be
| visible. So, I'll try finding a setting without them.
I say drop the current flame lens flaring and use a video camera
over-saturation effect there instead. And the white lens flare would go
nicely on the nose cone for it to be like a gleam of sunshine sparkling off of
it.
Well, maybe not do the video effect on second thought.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If this is a cruise missle then it needs little wings. Try looking up
pictures of tomahawks. Actually it would need four fins and not 3 if it
were not a cruise missle. I agree that the lens flare is not the best.
I'd suggest some clear objects with normals on them to try and simulate
a heat effect. During the day you would not be able to see a flame that
well.
Ian Burgmyer wrote:
>
> Here's a new version of my missile image, originally posted 4/27/1999. It
> is quite a bit different and much better then the last one (take it from me)
> ;-)
>
> Anyways, please tell me what you think! It's been a while since I've posted
> anything here :-)
>
> --
> This message brought to you by:
> -=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
>
> Please visit my site at http://www.spectere.com! :-)
> --
>
> P.S. This was compressed at 80% JPEG compression and still looks good. Just
> as a reference... :-D
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
