POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Missile Revisitied : Re: Missile Revisitied Server Time
2 Oct 2024 08:19:26 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Missile Revisitied  
From: Bob Hughes
Date: 15 Jun 2000 01:03:39
Message: <394863ab@news.povray.org>
"Ian Burgmyer" <the### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:39480f27@news.povray.org...
| "Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
| news:3947FC3E.C6B934B9@gmx.de...
| > Ok, the lens flare itself is not bad, it's just that something seems
| > missing.
|
| Dad suggested that the lens flare is a little inaccurate, and I agree with
| his reasons.  He says that at an angle like that, the rings wouldn't be
| visible.  So, I'll try finding a setting without them.

I say drop the current flame lens flaring and use a video camera
over-saturation effect there instead.  And the white lens flare would go
nicely on the nose cone for it to be like a gleam of sunshine sparkling off of
it.
Well, maybe not do the video effect on second thought.

Bob


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.