|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Fyttikatta! Very cool! Is it emitting media? I'd love to know how you do
this...
Simen.
>Here's another in the series. I might get used to coming up with these.
>They're simple, yet beautiful. I was also wondering if Gilles idea for
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Margus Ramst" <mar### [at] peakeduee> wrote in message
news:3908D22D.E76A9E1A@peak.edu.ee...
> Strange. Somehow seems to have that 'movement in your peripheral vision'
effect,
> I can't focus my eyes at the entire image. Very cool, but would probably
drive
> me nuts in the long run :)
>
I see it as strobing or getting slightly larger and smaller. Probably
like that "Can you find the black dot" image that was posted a few days
ago...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TonyB wrote:
>
> Here's another in the series. I might get used to coming up with these.
> They're simple, yet beautiful. I was also wondering if Gilles idea for
> post-process could be applied to media images, where it just maxes out and
> you don't want it to do that. Anyway, enjoy. :)
>
> [Image]
Nice, some kind of explosion maybe?
Jerome
--
* Doctor Jekyll had something * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
* to Hyde... * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
*******************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jerome wrote:
>
> Nice, some kind of explosion maybe?
>
> Jerome
Or a virus seen in false colors... (Which explains the
impression of movement :))
Jerome
--
* Doctor Jekyll had something * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
* to Hyde... * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
*******************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3908e5fe@news.povray.org>, "TonyB"
<ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote:
> Nooo! Chris! What have I done?! Here, put on some shades: B
:-)
> Some of us don't have to imagine... B)
If you are talking about the fact that I have a Mac, you should know
that Macs have had the ability to display background images with no 3rd
party software for quite a while now.
Well, it is the wrong size and aspect ratio, but it actually doesn't
look too bad on my secondary monitor. There is some nasty pixellation
visible, though... :-(
--
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Personal Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>If you are talking about the fact that I have a Mac, you should know
>that Macs have had the ability to display background images with no 3rd
>party software for quite a while now.
I wasn't referring to your having a Mac. I was just saying the I have it as
my desktop image, and I didn't have to imagine it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Fyttikatta!
I hope this was a compliment. ;)
>Very cool!
Thanks.
>Is it emitting media?
Yup, just like the previous image.
I'd love to know how you do this...
You know, you take a sphere, you hollow it out, you toss in some emission,
you give it a spherical for density, you use rgb 0 and a bozo for the
density_map, and give the bozo a blackhole with -7 to blow the particles
away, you come up with some nice colors, and viola, it's done. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>Fyttikatta!
>
>I hope this was a compliment. ;)
>
Yup. Norse. Translates to something like "damn that cat." (No, really!)
>You know, you take a sphere, you hollow it out, you toss in some emission,
>you give it a spherical for density, you use rgb 0 and a bozo for the
>density_map, and give the bozo a blackhole with -7 to blow the particles
>away, you come up with some nice colors, and viola, it's done. :)
>
Thanks for your info. But:
-blackhole? is it a megapov thing?
Simen.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3909abf6$1@news.povray.org>, "Simen Kvaal"
<sim### [at] studentmatnatuiono> wrote:
> Thanks for your info. But:
> -blackhole? is it a megapov thing?
No, it is a pattern warp in the official version:
4.7.8.8.1 Black Hole Warp
A black_hole warp is so named because of its similarity to real black
holes. Just like the real thing, you cannot actually see a black hole.
The only way to detect its presence is by the effect it has on things
that surround it.
...
The black hole can have the effect of either sucking the surrounding
texture into itself (like the real thing) or pushing it away.
--
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Personal Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Peter Popov" <pet### [at] usanet> wrote in message
news:aldigsgr3tj29gvbu75pguae8al2s4jtjv@4ax.com...
|
| Cool! My brother's first reaction was "Odd... an exploding hedgehog!"
|
:-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |