 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc Schimmler" <sch### [at] ica uni-stuttgartde> wrote in message
news:38EA5BC7.BF652B09@ica.uni-stuttgart.de...
| The rays doesn't need to be parallel. After the discussion here when
| Mick published his cloudy pic I looked for references and found that he
| had been right.
Yes, but this non-parallel one makes it look as though the sun is there in the
corner and I believe it's out of the picture instead. 'angle 67' in the camera,
so it is a wide field of view.
Glad you liked. I'll probably spend a good part of the day looking for those
first settings and when I do get it looking okay (that's a relative statement)
again I'll post the pov script.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Found this about it :
http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/%28Gl%29/guides/mtr/opt/air/crp.rxml
However it seems that crepuscular is meant for near horizon sunlight, "relating
to twilight" as it says there at the page. Should be the same thing though even
if 12 noon and storm clouds obscure all but some of the sunlight. The
parallel-yet-not phenomenon must only be perspective.
Bob
"Ben Paschke" <ben### [at] rspcomau> wrote in message
news:38EA8E1F.9BCD927F@rsp.com.au...
| i think i've also heard them being referred to as "fingers of God".
| benp
|
| Snowman wrote:
|
| > I think that this "phenomenon" is called 'crepuscular rays' (not really a
| > phenomenon, but you know what I mean)
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yep, if and when I get this thing back to a better look I'll post the pov
script.
Glad you liked it too Hartmut, but it's really only trial and error for the
cloud textures mostly. A contained media isn't too bad to work with.
Bob
"Markus Becker" <mar### [at] studentuni-siegende> wrote in message
news:38EB073A.7824441F@student.uni-siegen.de...
| Hartmut Wagener wrote:
| >
| > Hey,
| >
| > about the physics, it just looks better.
| > Go on, i think i will never be able to look media like this ...
|
| In fact the rays coming through the clouds in reality _are_ parallel.
| But they don't look like that because of the perspective. This should
| be possible to model in POV, too.
|
| Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks guys, it'll be posted if I can return the clouds to more like the first
time.
Bob
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote in message
news:38eade93@news.povray.org...
| Excellent!!! the rays shouldn't be parallel anyway. Definitely would like to
| know how you achieved this.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Impressive, but I think that in this particular image the
sky looks too close to the ground, I think it's just a
scale thing.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
10:17am up 1 day, 12:51, 4 users, load average: 1.30, 1.07, 1.02
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I must say, the top pic is REALLY good!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
