Yessir, this is a *very* detailed model. No blobs, though. Primitives
only.
And some sphere_sweeps.:)
Most of the detail is randomized, but the procedural "metal" texture
does most of the work.  Any guesses as to how the texture was done?
Hmm, let's see, I think I'll post the text-code 1 day from the sent time
of this message.  Comments??

--
H.E. Day

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'crusier.jpg' (59 KB)

Preview of image 'crusier.jpg'

H.E. Day does it again!

"H.E. Day" wrote:
> 
> Yessir, this is a *very* detailed model. No blobs, though. Primitives
> only.
> And some sphere_sweeps.:)
> Most of the detail is randomized, but the procedural "metal" texture
> does most of the work.  Any guesses as to how the texture was done?
> Hmm, let's see, I think I'll post the text-code 1 day from the sent time
> of this message.  Comments??
> 
> --
> H.E. Day
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

-- 
Mr. Art

"Often the appearance of reality is more important 
than the reality of the appearance."
Bill DeWitt 2000

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 27 Feb 2000 15:14:59 -0800, "H.E. Day" <hed### [at] fcinet> wrote:


>Most of the detail is randomized, but the procedural "metal" texture
>does most of the work.  Any guesses as to how the texture was done?

Nice texture, like an unpainted zinc die-casting. It seems to be a rectangular pattern
in
which you have controlled the reflectivity for each small rectangle, but how you have
done
this I don't know.
----------------------------
dav### [at] cwcomnet
http://www.hamiltonite.mcmail.com
----------------------------

Post a reply to this message

>  It seems to be a rectangular pattern in which you have controlled the reflectivity
for each
> small rectangle, but how you have done this I don't know.

Nope.  Try again. :)
--
H.E. Day

Post a reply to this message

"B5 got nothin' on me!"

No one has ever doubted you, sir... uh, sorry... Master. :)

Post a reply to this message

H.E. Day wrote:
>Yessir, this is a *very* detailed model. No blobs, though. Primitives
>only.
>And some sphere_sweeps.:)
>Most of the detail is randomized, but the procedural "metal" texture
>does most of the work.  Any guesses as to how the texture was done?
>Hmm, let's see, I think I'll post the text-code 1 day from the sent time
>of this message.  Comments??
>
>--
>H.E. Day

It's hideous, ugly, amateurish, ugly, horrible and ugly.
Ok, maybe it's not hideous.

Jide

Post a reply to this message

> It's hideous, ugly, amateurish, ugly, horrible and ugly.
> Ok, maybe it's not hideous.

You're gonna hafta explain that.  Especially the amateurish part.

--
H.E. Day

Post a reply to this message

"H.E. Day" wrote:

> > It's hideous, ugly, amateurish, ugly, horrible and ugly.
> > Ok, maybe it's not hideous.
>
> You're gonna hafta explain that.  Especially the amateurish part.
>
> --
> H.E. Day

Jealousy?
Irony?

--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.

Post a reply to this message

"H.E. Day" wrote:
> 
> > It's hideous, ugly, amateurish, ugly, horrible and ugly.
> > Ok, maybe it's not hideous.
> 
> You're gonna hafta explain that.  Especially the amateurish part.

Anti-praise ?

-- 
Ken Tyler -  1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message

"H.E. Day" wrote:
> 
>  Comments??

Just one, "cruiser" is spelled c-r-u-i-s-e-r.

Well actually, here's another one.  This picture is amazing.  Can we get
it in 1024x768?  


-- 
Francois Labreque | The surest sign of the existence of extra-
     flabreq      | terrestrial intelligence is that they never
        @         | bothered to come down here and visit us!
  attglobal.net                                  - Calvin

Post a reply to this message