 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I turned "genitals OFF" in the poser figure that I was using in my
rotoscope, the image I just posted. Hope this didn't violate any
policy.........
Ken wrote:
> Posted March 26, 2000
> 2.) We do have a small number of young people that visit this server.
> Because of this we ask that you keep this in mind before posting
> messages or images of an explicit sexual nature. While nudity is
> commonly used as a form of artistic expression we ask that you
> present it as tastefully as possible if you post images of this
> type. Use common sense where this is concerned and be aware that
> children may be watching as their parents download images posted
> here.
>
> You might consider uploading images of a controversial nature to
> your personal web page and provide a link to it from a message
> posted here. This gives people the opportunity to decide if they
> wish to view material of this type at their own discretion.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
>
> I turned "genitals OFF" in the poser figure that I was using in my
> rotoscope, the image I just posted. Hope this didn't violate any
> policy.........
I saw nothing distasteful in your image. I don't think I have ever seen
an image posted here that would be considered distasteful or not presented
artistically. I think the intent of this particular policy is to prevent
images that would be considered pornographic from being posted here.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> "Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> >
> > I turned "genitals OFF" in the poser figure that I was using in my
> > rotoscope, the image I just posted. Hope this didn't violate any
> > policy.........
>
> I saw nothing distasteful in your image. I don't think I have ever seen
> an image posted here that would be considered distasteful or not presented
> artistically. I think the intent of this particular policy is to prevent
> images that would be considered pornographic from being posted here.
Hmm, I think he was being sarcastic.
--
___ _______________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricy net> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Hmm, I think he was being sarcastic.
In that case, a very subtle sarcasm, I'd say. I have never thought of this
subject, and concluded that one really _has_ to be careful with ones
postings; graphical or not. So, I didn't interpret it as sarcasm. But of
course, as I am two out of three times, roughly, might be wrong. :)
Simen.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simen Kvaal wrote:
>
> >Hmm, I think he was being sarcastic.
>
> In that case, a very subtle sarcasm, I'd say. I have never thought of this
> subject, and concluded that one really _has_ to be careful with ones
> postings; graphical or not. So, I didn't interpret it as sarcasm.
I agree. If I had thought it was sarcasm I might have ignored it. However
it sounded like he really wanted an honest answer so I provided him with
one. There was a remote chance that others might similarly be confused
with the wording and I wanted to make sure they understood the intent
of the policy if there was any doubt. As a private, family oriented, news
server we feel we have a responsibility to keep it clean for everyone to
use without them feeling offended by it's contents.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
