 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I consider it finished. What do you think? I had to fake media using
discs.
ZK
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'alienfighter.jpg' (55 KB)
Preview of image 'alienfighter.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A very cool spacecraft. Nice going. I'm sure someone will bring up the fact
that there probably shouldn't be such glowing lights in the vacuum of space.
Oops, I just did--- pay no attention to me.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> A very cool spacecraft. Nice going. I'm sure someone will bring up the fact
> that there probably shouldn't be such glowing lights in the vacuum of space.
> Oops, I just did--- pay no attention to me.
:-) You're right, but it looks cool that way :-)
>
> Bob
ZK
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>I consider it finished. What do you think?
Yup, that looks finished to me too. Sweeet!
>I had to fake media using discs.
I can't tell. That means you did a good job. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 21:09:07 -0600, "Bob Hughes"
<omn### [at] hotmail com?subject=PoV-News:> wrote:
>I'm sure someone will bring up the fact that there
>probably shouldn't be such glowing lights in the
>vacuum of space.
The "fact" ?
On the contrary, these lighting effects are perfectly reasonable,
because they are the sort of effects that can be produced within one's
eye, a window pane, or inside a camera. The halation in this scene
isn't being produced in the vacuum of space, but in the vicinity of
the observer, which could very well contain an atmosphere,
less-than-perfect optics (eye or camera), and a less than perfect
recording medium (film, sensor, or retina.)
The halation is a circular pattern centered at the point of maximum
brightness, not a projected "beam", such as an automobile's headlight
shining through a hazy atmosphere. This sort of halation can be
produced, even if viewing an object located in deep space.
****************************************
For the record, this image is one of the best space images I remember
seeing here. I hope to see more work like this in the future.
Later,
Glen Berry
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Haven't you seen B-Grade science fiction movies Bob???
Bob Hughes <omn### [at] hotmailcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote in article
<38d83982@news.povray.org>...
> A very cool spacecraft. Nice going. I'm sure someone will bring up the
fact
> that there probably shouldn't be such glowing lights in the vacuum of
space.
> Oops, I just did--- pay no attention to me.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
BTW, I must know how you did the stars in the bg. Please explain.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000 04:01:01 +0100, ZEGER KNAEPEN
<ZEG### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe> wrote:
>I consider it finished. What do you think? I had to fake media using
>discs.
>
>ZK
Spaceship renders are usually a big turn off for me, but this has something I
find very attractive. Thinking about the glow from the "headlights", perhaps we
could consider this as some sort of micrometeorite shield that is visible as an
ionisation glow :-)
I like it so much I shall use it as wallpaper for a while. Thanks Zeger.
----------------------------
dav### [at] cableinetcouk
http://members.vavo.com/squiffy/
http://www.hamiltonite.mcmail.com
----------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <2k7hdss5qtfq59t6tur4a43g641pft6g96@4ax.com>, David
Wilkinson <dav### [at] cableinetcouk> wrote:
> Spaceship renders are usually a big turn off for me, but this has
> something I find very attractive. Thinking about the glow from the
> "headlights", perhaps we could consider this as some sort of
> micrometeorite shield that is visible as an ionisation glow :-)
Nice explanation, but ionization of what? The gaseous remains of a
meteorite that just hit/got hit?
Anyway, as mentioned by Glen Berry, this sort of thing is usually caused
by the lens, not the atmosphere.
--
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very, very nice.
Bob Hughes <omn### [at] hotmailcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote in message
news:38d83982@news.povray.org...
> A very cool spacecraft. Nice going. I'm sure someone will bring up the
fact
> that there probably shouldn't be such glowing lights in the vacuum of
space.
> Oops, I just did--- pay no attention to me.
>
The gaseous debris of a recently destroyed foe?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
