 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
My additions to the inverted reflective surfaces...
Top... Superellispoid... Particularly slow for some reason...?
Bottom... Torus...
Both use media to give nice color to them.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '???.jpg' (19 KB)
Download '???m5.jpg' (6 KB)
Preview of image '???.jpg'
Preview of image '???m5.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The torus one looks an awful lot like a praying mantis face on.
'superellipsoid' can just be plain slow sometimes anyhow, and I think I also see
a face in that one too.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> My additions to the inverted reflective surfaces...
What is an inverted reflective surface? Or do you just mean the object has
inverse and is reflective, in which case hollow does the same effect and you
mean it's another "internal reflection" post.
Anyway some wierd effects...
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricy net>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"The Truth Is Out There"...
Bob Hughes wrote:
> The torus one looks an awful lot like a praying mantis face on.
> 'superellipsoid' can just be plain slow sometimes anyhow, and I think I also see
> a face in that one too.
>
> Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Inverted was not the right word... but... I like the sound of it better...
Yes it is just an inside on the outside of the camera "internal"
I still like inverse meaning backwards or upside down...
David Fontaine wrote:
> > My additions to the inverted reflective surfaces...
>
> What is an inverted reflective surface? Or do you just mean the object has
> inverse and is reflective, in which case hollow does the same effect and you
> mean it's another "internal reflection" post.
> Anyway some wierd effects...
>
> --
> Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
> ___ ______________________________
> | \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet>
> |_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:49:01 -0600, David Fontaine wrote:
>> My additions to the inverted reflective surfaces...
>
>What is an inverted reflective surface? Or do you just mean the object has
>inverse and is reflective, in which case hollow does the same effect and you
>mean it's another "internal reflection" post.
Unless you're using media or atmosphere, you shouldn't need either inverse or
hollow.
--
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Both images use media...
Actually i think that the inside out reflective torus only worked w/ hollow...
otherwise the inside of a shape will not reflect any color...
all the color coming from light not an actual pigment...
Ron Parker wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:49:01 -0600, David Fontaine wrote:
> >> My additions to the inverted reflective surfaces...
> >
> >What is an inverted reflective surface? Or do you just mean the object has
> >inverse and is reflective, in which case hollow does the same effect and you
> >mean it's another "internal reflection" post.
>
> Unless you're using media or atmosphere, you shouldn't need either inverse or
> hollow.
>
> --
> These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
> The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
> My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
that bottom one is absolutely beautiful.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you :)
Ross Litscher wrote:
> that bottom one is absolutely beautiful.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
