 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Radiosity works a lot better with M.P. There is a slowdown around the
canopy, versus SuperPatch, but the result was worth it.
Now, if I could just get a realistic looking sun to work with this scene. :)
--
GrimDude
gri### [at] iso net
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'MPTest.jpg' (82 KB)
Preview of image 'MPTest.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
To me it seems "scan line-ish" because there aren't reflections or
highlights on the Mustang. Good image though.
Harold
GrimDude <gri### [at] netfreecom> wrote in message
news:38838a68@news.povray.org...
> Radiosity works a lot better with M.P. There is a slowdown around the
> canopy, versus SuperPatch, but the result was worth it.
>
> Now, if I could just get a realistic looking sun to work with this scene.
:)
>
> --
> GrimDude
> gri### [at] isonet
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The plane is good. Is that land in the backgorund? It looks kind of wierd.
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wish you luck on getting the sun better, I've tried to make my share of them
before and never was satisfied; maybe try that diffused sun technique that was
talked about here some months ago. I've forgotten now how that goes to make it.
Something I think is wrong is how the sun should be illuminating that portion of
sky and along the horizon more. Also the plane probably needs to be picking up
on that too, whether by reflection or specular hilight or both.
Bob
"GrimDude" <gri### [at] netfreecom> wrote in message
news:38838a68@news.povray.org...
> Radiosity works a lot better with M.P. There is a slowdown around the
> canopy, versus SuperPatch, but the result was worth it.
>
> Now, if I could just get a realistic looking sun to work with this scene. :)
>
> --
> GrimDude
> gri### [at] isonet
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
GrimDude wrote in message <38838a68@news.povray.org>...
>Now, if I could just get a realistic looking sun to work with this scene.
:)
Try using a Mie scattering media to get a general glow in the sky near the
sun. Alternaltively, you could try using a lens flare for the sun.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Some time ago I used this pigment on a plane as a fake sunset:
pigment {
onion
colour_map {
[0 colour rgb 1]
[32*d colour rgb 1]
[58*d colour rgb <255,248,80>/255]
[63*d colour rgb <252,182,52>/255]
[268*d colour rgb <251,96,66>/255]
[1 colour rgb <186,71,53>/255]
}
}
finish {ambient 1}
scale 12
sig.
GrimDude wrote:
>
> Radiosity works a lot better with M.P. There is a slowdown around the
> canopy, versus SuperPatch, but the result was worth it.
>
> Now, if I could just get a realistic looking sun to work with this scene. :)
>
> --
> GrimDude
> gri### [at] isonet
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oops. Forgot this one:
#declare d=1/500;
Sigmund Kyrre Aas wrote:
>
> Some time ago I used this pigment on a plane as a fake sunset:
>
> pigment {
> onion
> colour_map {
> [0 colour rgb 1]
> [32*d colour rgb 1]
> [58*d colour rgb <255,248,80>/255]
> [63*d colour rgb <252,182,52>/255]
> [268*d colour rgb <251,96,66>/255]
> [1 colour rgb <186,71,53>/255]
> }
> }
> finish {ambient 1}
> scale 12
>
> sig.
>
> GrimDude wrote:
> >
> > Radiosity works a lot better with M.P. There is a slowdown around the
> > canopy, versus SuperPatch, but the result was worth it.
> >
> > Now, if I could just get a realistic looking sun to work with this scene. :)
> >
> > --
> > GrimDude
> > gri### [at] isonet
> >
> > [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
