An image I made recently... open to comments, suggestions, etc.  I also made a stereo
image just for the heck of it, if you want to
see - but it's as hard to view as the recent one posted here, with all the objects
hanging over the bezier thing.

Suggestions, comments, criticism?

-Slime

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'Boxes.jpg' (62 KB) Download 'bxstereo.jpg' (16 KB)

Preview of image 'Boxes.jpg'

Preview of image 'bxstereo.jpg'

I could see it very well: only in stereo I realized that the transparent
thing is surrounding the boxes. Very demonstrative!

--
Regards,
Sander


<msk### [at] msncom> schreef in berichtnieuws 387b91d8@news.povray.org...
> An image I made recently... open to comments, suggestions, etc.  I also
made a stereo image just for the heck of it, if you want to
> see - but it's as hard to view as the recent one posted here, with all the
objects hanging over the bezier thing.
>
> Suggestions, comments, criticism?
>
> -Slime

Post a reply to this message

Excellent image, and it demonstrates some of what is gained by a
stereoscopic
pair. Love the transparent surface surrounding the boxes. I found it easy to
view in cross-eye format. Take out the white space between the two images,
save the file with the extension "jps" and it could be read by some stereo
image viewing programs such as DepthCharge ( http://www.3dexpo.com/ ) or
the Java applet called Stereoscope http://www.stereophotography.com/sapplet/
.

Cheers,
Harold

<msk### [at] msncom> wrote in message news:387b91d8@news.povray.org...
> An image I made recently... open to comments, suggestions, etc.  I also
made a stereo image just for the heck of it, if you want to
> see - but it's as hard to view as the recent one posted here, with all the
objects hanging over the bezier thing.
>
> Suggestions, comments, criticism?
>
> -Slime
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Is that box an isosurface?

msk### [at] msncom wrote:

> An image I made recently... open to comments, suggestions, etc.  I also made a
stereo image just for the heck of it, if you want to
> see - but it's as hard to view as the recent one posted here, with all the objects
hanging over the bezier thing.
>
> Suggestions, comments, criticism?
>
> -Slime
>
>  [Image]
>
>  [Image]

--
Samuel Benge

E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom

Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge

Post a reply to this message

Nope, I don't have MegaPov (and probably won't until i get another computer, one or
two months from now).  I used a little
randomness, a few variables, and some while loops to create a three dimensional array
of boxes - and then a transparent box with
some media behind it.

- Slime

SamuelT. <STB### [at] aolcom> wrote in message news:387### [at] aolcom...
> Is that box an isosurface?
>
> msk### [at] msncom wrote:
>
> > An image I made recently... open to comments, suggestions, etc.  I also made a
stereo image just for the heck of it, if you want
to
> > see - but it's as hard to view as the recent one posted here, with all the objects
hanging over the bezier thing.
> >
> > Suggestions, comments, criticism?
> >
> > -Slime
> >
> >  [Image]
> >
> >  [Image]
>
> --
> Samuel Benge
>
> E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
>
> Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
>
>

Post a reply to this message

The blue and purple tones are very nice. Reminds me of JPEG compression (doesn't it
use something like this? I don't know what I'm
talking about.)

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>

Post a reply to this message