 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Gail Shaw
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 10 Jan 2000 04:42:48
Message: <3879a998@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
SamuelT. wrote in message <387936A6.F65CA930@aol.com>...
>Questions? Comments?
Wonderful. Gives a great feeling of peace and calmness
Any chance of the source/ a larger version. This looks like a very
good contendor for the next desktop image. (To replace your deserrt scene of
november)
Gail
*******************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotix coza * ERROR: COFFEE.COM not found *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Insert cup and press any key *
*******************************************************************
* Definition of an upgrade: Take the old bugs out, put new ones in*
*******************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 09 Jan 2000 21:28:49 -0800, in message
<38796E10.2E452D06@aol.com>, "SamuelT." <STB### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>The water just simply isn't picking the sky up. Perhaps if I
>increased the normal depth of the waves, the sky would reflect, but I think
>calmer water might look better.
Hmm, maybe, but I like the look of the water the way it is - gives the
impression of movement past the canopy. I can 'hear' a soothing gurgling
sound when I look at your image <s>.
--
Alan - ako### [at] povrayorg - a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mick Hazelgrove
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 10 Jan 2000 06:24:44
Message: <3879c17c@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes I too find this a very peaceful image. Excellent work
Mick
--
*************************************************************
http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
*************************************************************
Gail Shaw <gsh### [at] monotixcoza> wrote in message
news:3879a998@news.povray.org...
>
> SamuelT. wrote in message <387936A6.F65CA930@aol.com>...
> >Questions? Comments?
>
>
> Wonderful. Gives a great feeling of peace and calmness
>
>
> Any chance of the source/ a larger version. This looks like a very
> good contendor for the next desktop image. (To replace your deserrt scene
of
> november)
>
> Gail
> *******************************************************************
> * gsh### [at] monotixcoza * ERROR: COFFEE.COM not found *
> * http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Insert cup and press any key *
> *******************************************************************
> * Definition of an upgrade: Take the old bugs out, put new ones in*
> *******************************************************************
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 09 Jan 2000 17:32:22 -0800, "SamuelT." <STB### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>
>I'm still unhappy with the way I colored the cliff and it's plants, so I
>guess the scene isn't done yet.
>
The cliffs have the texture and colour I would expect in a some limestones and I like
the
naturalness of the plants. The water is good - don't change it!
What jars slightly in the image for me is the square base under the canopy going
straight
down into the water. To achieve a more realistic feel to this I would like to see it
resting on a, perhaps, sloping rock just surfacing from the water.
These iso-surfaces are creating a revolution in POV!
Great stuff.
David
----------------------------
dav### [at] cwcomnet
http://www.hamiltonite.mcmail.com
----------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: SamuelT
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 10 Jan 2000 22:53:28
Message: <387AAB3F.8C16C435@aol.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
omniVERSE wrote:
> Not sure why there's any question as to the width of this image,<snip!>
The question is mine, since me SE version of PSP won't tell me.
--
Samuel Benge
E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: SamuelT
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 10 Jan 2000 22:55:50
Message: <387AABCD.91E32C9E@aol.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> SamuelT. wrote in message <387936A6.F65CA930@aol.com>...
> >Questions? Comments?
>
> Wonderful. Gives a great feeling of peace and calmness
Thanks.
> Any chance of the source/ a larger version. This looks like a very
> good contendor for the next desktop image.
I worry that if I make the image bigger, the plants won't look like plants
anymore, but rather the noisy objects they really are. As for the source, I hope
to update my site soon, which will say how to do these sorts of things.
--
Samuel Benge
E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: SamuelT
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 10 Jan 2000 22:58:12
Message: <387AAC5B.90D89CB0@aol.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Wilkinson wrote:
> <snip!>What jars slightly in the image for me is the square base under the canopy
going
> straight
> down into the water. To achieve a more realistic feel to this I would like to see
it
> resting on a, perhaps, sloping rock just surfacing from the water.
It bothers me too, but I forgot to fix it before rendering it. I might use rocks, I
might do
something else, I don't know yet.
> These iso-surfaces are creating a revolution in POV!
Well, isosurfaces are revolutionary objects.
--
Samuel Benge
E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mark Wagner
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 11 Jan 2000 00:59:48
Message: <387ac6d4@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
SamuelT. wrote in message <387AAC5B.90D89CB0@aol.com>...
>> These iso-surfaces are creating a revolution in POV!
>
>Well, isosurfaces are revolutionary objects.
Isosurfaces are not revolutionary objects. SORs and lathes are.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mark Wagner wrote:
> Isosurfaces are not revolutionary objects. SORs and lathes are.
I am the center of the universe and everything revolves around me.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 11 Jan 2000 10:25:00
Message: <387b4b4c@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:59:46 -0500, Mark Wagner wrote:
>
>SamuelT. wrote in message <387AAC5B.90D89CB0@aol.com>...
>>> These iso-surfaces are creating a revolution in POV!
>>
>>Well, isosurfaces are revolutionary objects.
>
>
>Isosurfaces are not revolutionary objects. SORs and lathes are.
Isosurfaces can be revolutionary objects. For example,
z*z-x*x-y*y+1 threshold 0 is the surface of revolution of a
parabola.
--
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
