POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Scale (30k b.u.) Server Time
3 Oct 2024 19:17:42 EDT (-0400)
  Scale (30k b.u.) (Message 2 to 11 of 11)  
<<< Previous 1 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: David Heys
Subject: Scale (65k b.u.)
Date: 4 Jan 2000 14:05:59
Message: <38724181.4DBA6D78@gci.net>
Stefan Weinzierl wrote:

> Hi!
>
> A new image made be me. A scale (is this the right name?)
> Yes I know, the picture is a little bit to dark and there is no wheigt
> on it...

Nice Scale. :{) It reminded me of a scale I created for a local lawyer
sometime back. Unfortunately mine is more symbolic than functional. I didn't
build in the ability to tilt. :{P

David
--
Keeper of the family pets.
"You want fish? I got fish. I got fish, and eels, and turtles, and snails, and
frogs, and dragons and cats..."


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'scales.jpg' (66 KB)

Preview of image 'scales.jpg'
scales.jpg


 

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Scale (30k b.u.)
Date: 4 Jan 2000 17:53:35
Message: <387277A2.9EA63266@faricy.net>
> A new image made be me. A scale (is this the right name?)

Nope, it's a balance.

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Scale (30k b.u.)
Date: 4 Jan 2000 17:59:35
Message: <38727B44.5E4B8BED@pacbell.net>
David Fontaine wrote:
> 
> > A new image made be me. A scale (is this the right name?)
> 
> Nope, it's a balance.

Just so you don't get away with being too smug with that reply scales
is also an accurate designation for this type of measurement device.

Have you ever heard of the "scales of justice" ?

http://www.sculpturegallery.com/sculpture/scales_of_justice_bronze_sm.html

-- 
Ken Tyler -  1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Scale (30k b.u.)
Date: 4 Jan 2000 18:05:23
Message: <38727A63.766B4BF2@faricy.net>
> Just so you don't get away with being too smug with that reply scales
> is also an accurate designation for this type of measurement device.

Okay, yes, "balance" is more for the thing with the sliding weights.

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>


Post a reply to this message

From: omniVERSE
Subject: Re: Scale (65k b.u.)
Date: 4 Jan 2000 18:10:23
Message: <38727ddf@news.povray.org>
Neato, scales!  I might be able to make one too, thanks for giving me the
idea, intended or not.
The camera perspective really plays into these two images.  Any tilts other
than the weighing kind make them seem unbalanced.  I only half mean that
though.

Bob

"David Heys" <sou### [at] gcinet> wrote in message
news:38724181.4DBA6D78@gci.net...
> Stefan Weinzierl wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > A new image made be me. A scale (is this the right name?)
> > Yes I know, the picture is a little bit to dark and there is no wheigt
> > on it...
>
> Nice Scale. :{) It reminded me of a scale I created for a local lawyer
> sometime back. Unfortunately mine is more symbolic than functional. I
didn't
> build in the ability to tilt. :{P
>
> David
> --
> Keeper of the family pets.
> "You want fish? I got fish. I got fish, and eels, and turtles, and snails,
and
> frogs, and dragons and cats..."
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Scale (30k b.u.)
Date: 4 Jan 2000 19:09:14
Message: <slrn8752gv.3mo.sjlen@zero-pps.localdomain>
You'd call it a 'set of scales'.  And yes it does look good. 

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps


Post a reply to this message

From: Robert Chaffe
Subject: Re: Scale (30k b.u.)
Date: 4 Jan 2000 21:05:05
Message: <3872a6d1@news.povray.org>
Pretty good.
Perhaps a nice ruled arc near the tip of that center extender for
measurements of some sort?
rc


Post a reply to this message

From: David Heys
Subject: Re: Scale (65k b.u.)
Date: 4 Jan 2000 22:33:53
Message: <3872B8A6.D398F89E@gci.net>
omniVERSE wrote:

> The camera perspective really plays into these two images.  Any tilts other
> than the weighing kind make them seem unbalanced.

You're right. In my case, a front-on view was what we wanted anyhow, but it is
irksome that other camera angles tended to make it look "off". I think Stefan's
will not suffer as much though, as it is already off balance.

David
--
Keeper of the family pets.
"You want fish? I got fish. I got fish, and eels, and turtles, and snails, and
frogs, and dragons and cats..."


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Popov
Subject: Re: Scale (30k b.u.)
Date: 5 Jan 2000 15:08:11
Message: <W6RzON7yA0oTSpoNnhS5G1=HZSiq@4ax.com>
On Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:38:16 +0100, Stefan Weinzierl
<Ste### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:

>Hi!
>
>A new image made be me. A scale (is this the right name?) 
>Yes I know, the picture is a little bit to dark and there is no wheigt
>on it...

Ah great! I wanted to model one of these, lemme see, about sixteen
months ago, and failed (missed the deadline, sort of :) ). Lance
helped me out back then with a set of scales he had modelled in MAX
but still I failed. It's good to see you did't.


Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700


Post a reply to this message

From: mskjmhag
Subject: Re: Scale (30k b.u.)
Date: 5 Jan 2000 19:18:18
Message: <3873df4a$1@news.povray.org>
Yeah... this is a "balance scale".

-Slime


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 1 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.