POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Mushrooms again (~58.4k) Server Time
3 Oct 2024 21:19:49 EDT (-0400)
  Mushrooms again (~58.4k) (Message 5 to 14 of 14)  
<<< Previous 4 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 29 Dec 1999 17:53:28
Message: <386A8EB9.B40EF29D@faricy.net>
> That isn't MegaPOV specific, the dda_traversal warning.  Not as common a
> thing to see as it used to be in earlier versions of POV-Ray.  I usually
> encountered the problem with height fields when another object was being
> intersected with them somehow.

I believe I encountered this message rendering the phalanx scene. The grass
height fields caused the error to scroll down and fill up the message window
after which the computer crashed. Rotating the grass a degree or two fixed it.

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>


Post a reply to this message

From: Ryan Twitchell
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 29 Dec 1999 21:44:38
Message: <386ac716@news.povray.org>
Gee, thanks. *blush*

 Ryan Twitchell

as### [at] studntnuno (Sigmund Kyrre Aas) wrote in <386A5101.820677B4@stud.ntnu.no>:

>I really envy your textures. The finish is spot-on realistic and the
>colours are so vibrant! I think real mushrooms are more wet looking, but
>theese are better than real!
>
>sig.


Post a reply to this message

From: Ryan Twitchell
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 29 Dec 1999 21:54:17
Message: <386ac959@news.povray.org>
Thanks, I'm glad to get all these positve responses. And actually, it's more like 
the tiny ones are just a different species of mushroom, they don't grow as big as 
the other ones.

 Ryan Twitchell

gre### [at] my-dejanewscom (Greg M. Johnson) wrote in <386A5289.7EC71303@my-
dejanews.com>:

>If I were voting on this in terms of IRTC, I'd say that it's very pretty: pretty
>use of colors--high artistic score.
>
>Conceptually, though, it really bugs me.  WHY ARE there two different sizes of
>mushrooms?  You can't say they are baby ones: they're too close together....


Post a reply to this message

From: Ryan Twitchell
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 29 Dec 1999 21:56:14
Message: <386ac9ce@news.povray.org>
The rotation seems to have fixed the problem, thank you.

 Ryan Twitchell

dav### [at] faricynet (David Fontaine) wrote in
<386A8EB9.B40EF29D@faricy.net>: 

>> That isn't MegaPOV specific, the dda_traversal warning.  Not as common
>> a thing to see as it used to be in earlier versions of POV-Ray.  I
>> usually encountered the problem with height fields when another object
>> was being intersected with them somehow.
>
>I believe I encountered this message rendering the phalanx scene. The
>grass height fields caused the error to scroll down and fill up the
>message window after which the computer crashed. Rotating the grass a
>degree or two fixed it. 
>
>--
>Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
>___     ______________________________
> | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
> |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: H E  Day
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 29 Dec 1999 22:10:53
Message: <386ACBD8.618D8808@teleport.com>
One reason you may be having trouble with the shadow is because some of the
mushrooms are actually floating!  Really!  Look at the shadows in the lower
right-hand corner.  See what I mean?  Shadows without objects.  Bring them
shrooms back to earth and I think your shadow problems will go away.

H.E. Day

Ryan Twitchell wrote:

> Here's a development of my mushroom garden. I'm still playing with shadows,
> which are proving to be a pain; I'm struggling against fog and radiosity to
> make them more visible. Except for that and the one jagged edge on the
> yellow/green mushroom that just won't go away, I'm very happy with the image.
> The smaller mushrooms don't collide with the large ones anymore, I appreciate
> everyone's help with that, thanks.
>
> I do have a question for all you MegaPOV people: What the heck does "Illegal
> grid value in dda_traversal()." mean? This is some kind of debugging message
> I assume, but how do I get rid of it?
>
>  Ryan Twtchell
>
>  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 30 Dec 1999 00:13:02
Message: <386AE7A8.A55783E8@faricy.net>
You aren't using the IRTC to promote shroom use, are you? j/k
H.E. Day was right, some of them are floating. Otherwise it's looking better
every day...err...post.

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>


Post a reply to this message

From: Ian Burgmyer
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 30 Dec 1999 01:53:53
Message: <386b0181@news.povray.org>
You know you've been raytracing for too long when it looks more real then
life ;-)

--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-

Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)

Sigmund Kyrre Aas <as### [at] studntnuno> wrote in message
news:386A5101.820677B4@stud.ntnu.no...
> I really envy your textures. The finish is spot-on realistic and the
> colours are so vibrant! I think real mushrooms are more wet looking, but
> theese are better than real!
>
> sig.
>
> Ryan Twitchell wrote:
> >
> > Here's a development of my mushroom garden. I'm still playing with
shadows,
> > which are proving to be a pain; I'm struggling against fog and radiosity
to
> > make them more visible. Except for that and the one jagged edge on the
> > yellow/green mushroom that just won't go away, I'm very happy with the
image.
> > The smaller mushrooms don't collide with the large ones anymore, I
appreciate
> > everyone's help with that, thanks.
> >
> > I do have a question for all you MegaPOV people: What the heck does
"Illegal
> > grid value in dda_traversal()." mean? This is some kind of debugging
message
> > I assume, but how do I get rid of it?
> >
> >  Ryan Twtchell
> >
> >  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

From: Ryan Twitchell
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 30 Dec 1999 16:15:58
Message: <386bcb8e@news.povray.org>
Actually, this is because I'm placing them randomly over a heightfield 
without varying their height. I found an easy solution was to just lengthen 
the stems.

 Ryan Twitchell

Pov### [at] aolcom (H.E. Day) wrote in <386ACBD8.618D8808@teleport.com>:

>One reason you may be having trouble with the shadow is because some of the
>mushrooms are actually floating!  Really!  Look at the shadows in the lower
>right-hand corner.  See what I mean?  Shadows without objects.  Bring them
>shrooms back to earth and I think your shadow problems will go away.
>
>H.E. Day


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 1 Jan 2000 09:03:23
Message: <slrn86qqdj.fp.sjlen@zero-pps.localdomain>
It's just getting better all the time.

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps


Post a reply to this message

From: Alf Peake
Subject: Re: Mushrooms again (~58.4k)
Date: 1 Jan 2000 19:27:39
Message: <386e9b7b@news.povray.org>
Hey - I like. Plenty of colour. Hows about just one (pretty please?) upturned cap?
Look good enuf to smoke ;)

Just posted Random object placement in pov.t.s-f, in response (sorry for delay) to
your
post in pov.general

Alf

Ryan Twitchell <try### [at] rochesterrrcom> wrote in message
news:386a38b9@news.povray.org...
> The smaller mushrooms don't collide with the large ones anymore, I appreciate
> everyone's help with that, thanks.
>
>  Ryan Twtchell
>


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 4 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.