 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
OK, I hope you can see this one better. But you really should train yourself
to work in the dark, like me...
Margus
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'RecursiveB.jpg' (84 KB)
Preview of image 'RecursiveB.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Spider wrote in message <37212084.B1EAC780@bahnhof.se>...
>hmm, I'd almost guess I was responisble to some of the inspiration..
>
It happens...
>It looks kewl anyhow :-)
>
Yeah. I like it.
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I liked the first one better. :)
Are you a MAC user?
GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansas net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Margus Ramst wrote:
>
> OK, I hope you can see this one better. But you really should train yourself
> to work in the dark, like me...
>
> Margus
>
> [Image]
I can see clearly now the dark is gone...
I approve of work in this direction and see it's possible uses for alien
hair do's and exotic food stuffs. And maybe trees as well.
Is it difficult to create and control the routines that produce
these functions or is it pretty much straight forward once you
have a working format to expand on your work from ?
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote in message <37215CD8.20198341@pacbell.net>...
>
>I can see clearly now the dark is gone...
>
> I approve of work in this direction and see it's possible uses for alien
>hair do's and exotic food stuffs. And maybe trees as well.
>
It would be easy to modify the algorithm to produce tree-like shapes. But
that would imply introducing randomness, in effect defeating my original
objective.
> Is it difficult to create and control the routines that produce
>these functions or is it pretty much straight forward once you
>have a working format to expand on your work from ?
>
I'd say once you have the necessary macro structure, expanding is pretty
straightforward - within the limits of the structure provided. However I
have already hit some of those limits with my macro and am now trying to
figure out a way to overcome them.
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
GrimDude wrote in message <372134ad.0@news.povray.org>...
>I liked the first one better. :)
>
Me too
>Are you a MAC user?
>
Mac? No, and the times I've even seen a Mac can be counted on the fingers of
one hand. They're very rare in Estonia. Why do you ask?
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmm, I've had a few local Mac users complain about my images being too
bright. :) I see it's not just a Mac problem?
GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansasnet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
GrimDude wrote in message <372207a1.0@news.povray.org>...
>Hmm, I've had a few local Mac users complain about my images being too
>bright. :) I see it's not just a Mac problem?
>
The problem is that I worked in complete darkness, where the image looked
OK. The second image was brighter because it was dawning by then :)
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Heh, yeah I have a similar problem. Monitor is fading *and* I work in dim
light.
GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansasnet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Whenever I render an image on my Mac and view on my Windows machine it
looks darker. Macphiles claim it's the lack of proper Gamma correction,
and Windows users claim that the Mac is wrong. (where I work, Mac's are
considered to be the embodiemnt of OS Evil)
Josh
GrimDude wrote:
> Hmm, I've had a few local Mac users complain about my images being too
> bright. :) I see it's not just a Mac problem?
>
> GrimDude
> vos### [at] arkansasnet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
