 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, I'm not sure what you were seeing "critic" Spider ;) but I see a
pretty good ocean surface there. What it needs is a slight atmosphere
obscuration to show at the horizon. I think it would look great animated
so I'm waiting to see that.
Nicholas DePetrillo wrote:
>
> Nos is this realistic or what? looks like a photo doesnt it? well its not!
> it was made entirely in pov-ray. I am now going to render an animation (3
> seconds long) of the ocean and the waves this is liek the first frame of the
> animation. Look for the animation in the binarys.animation news group today
> or tomorrow.
>
> STATS:
> celeron 400 overclocked to 500
> 256 megs of RAm (sdram)
> fast as hell scsi 2 hard drive 5 gigs (not much but they are expensive!)
> and wndows NT 4.0 sp 4
>
> here is the image...tell me what you think and if it looks real...
>
> [Image]
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aol com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> Well, I'm not sure what you were seeing "critic" Spider ;) but I see a
> pretty good ocean surface there. What it needs is a slight atmosphere
> obscuration to show at the horizon. I think it would look great animated
> so I'm waiting to see that.
I agree with you... hmm, a slightly turbulented ground fog with a big
distance... *thoughtful glance*
and I agree, it would look good animated.
--
//Spider
[ spi### [at] bahnhofse ]-[ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
What I can do and what I could do, I just don't know anymore
"Marian"
By: "Sisters Of Mercy"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like it.
A bit like Spider said, looks a bit too dry, I think this is
because there doesn't appear to be a direct light source.
Reminds me of being on the ferry.
Cheers
Steve
Nicholas DePetrillo wrote:
>
> Nos is this realistic or what? looks like a photo doesnt it? well its not!
> it was made entirely in pov-ray. I am now going to render an animation (3
> seconds long) of the ocean and the waves this is liek the first frame of the
> animation. Look for the animation in the binarys.animation news group today
> or tomorrow.
>
> STATS:
> celeron 400 overclocked to 500
> 256 megs of RAm (sdram)
> fast as hell scsi 2 hard drive 5 gigs (not much but they are expensive!)
> and wndows NT 4.0 sp 4
>
> here is the image...tell me what you think and if it looks real...
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> Well, I'm not sure what you were seeing "critic" Spider ;) but I see a
> pretty good ocean surface there. What it needs is a slight atmosphere
> obscuration to show at the horizon. I think it would look great animated
> so I'm waiting to see that.
>
If you're really up to it AND have Windows95/98 installed on some system you
could try the 5Mb download of ACWODS which is nothing more then suggested here
in a screensaver-form.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~remcodek/zip/acwods.zip
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That is by far the best ocean I have ever seen come out of POV. Some
people get water that looks ok at a distance, while others have water
that look ok up close. This image gets the best of both. My guess for th
method is a waves normal combined with some other normal all converted
to a HF, thand rendered.
Please post the source (or, if it is an HF, post the method for creating
the surface and the textures used)!!!
If there was anything that needed improvement, consider making the
highlights less blue and the non-waves component of the surface less
noticable)
--
Chris Maryan
mailto:cma### [at] geocitiescom
***
Will work for cash.
***
Email me if you are interested in donating
to the Chris Maryan needs money fund.
We will also accept donations to the Chris
needs a Pentium III or SGI workstation
fund and the Chris needs a car fund.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
you guys wanted to know how long it took...well it took no more than 2 to 3
min...it doesnt have a lot of refectivity or raytracing stuff in it (the
shadows were reaytraced and satuff) but it looks real right?....
nick d
n1h### [at] homecom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicholas DePetrillo wrote:
>
> Nos ...
The ocean looks great! I wood like to plunge in.
How did you do that?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:371A4485.5B99C363@aol.com...
> Well, I'm not sure what you were seeing "critic" Spider ;) but I see a
> pretty good ocean surface there. What it needs is a slight atmosphere
> obscuration to show at the horizon. I think it would look great animated
> so I'm waiting to see that.
Obscuration???
Eric
-------------------
"The best trick the devil ever pulled was
convincing people he didn't exist..."
- Verbal Kent.
-------------------
http://www.ametro.net/~ericfree
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Um, yep, a bit of haziness is what I was saying there.
Eric Freeman wrote:
>
> > What it needs is a slight atmosphere
> > obscuration to show at the horizon.
>
> Obscuration???
>
> Eric
>
> -------------------
> "The best trick the devil ever pulled was
> convincing people he didn't exist..."
> - Verbal Kent.
> -------------------
> http://www.ametro.net/~ericfree
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:37243AD7.787F4405@aol.com...
[I wrote]
> > Obscuration???
> Um, yep, a bit of haziness is what I was saying there.
Oh, ok. Thanks for the clarifyation.
Eric
---------------------------------
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
--- Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943
---------------------------------
http://www.ametro.net/~ericfree
---------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
