 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I dunno were you all come from (I've heard rumors about australia...)
but I'm pretty ashamed to say that in Israel warez-cracks are all very
common, in fact more than 80% of all software is pirated (as of 1995). I
must admit, I'm guilty as well in software piracy (in the past, at
least). However, I made a decision that I would rather use freeware, as
to promote that kind of distribution. I myself have written a couple of
utilities-programs-apps in my recent years, and always distributed them
free. I'm not bragging or something I think it should be done that way,
because I know of many crappy programs, shareware ones, that the author
was to cheap to distribute freely. It's not like he's gonna make a
fortune of it or like he's starving (I suppose...). Anyway, I think that
warez is just a crime like any other petty theft, with the exception
that it doesn't FEEL like a crime, that is, you don't really have to do
anything, so you fool yourself into thinking it's ok.
That's all, and BTW POV is great.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ya it the same in a sense. Intel wants you to pay high prices if you
want a SMP system. If you make your Celeron a SMP system you will pay
magnitudes less for it. Your right you can't remarket a Celeron as a
Xeon, but how much performance increase do you get for paying 10 times
as much money to buy a true Xeon system. Not much, or not enough for
the price I should say. My point was if something can be cracked
someone will do it. No matter what. They are not the evil ones, the
people who actually use the pirated software are.
Used it in what way? No I havn't really. I admit I had Photoshop on my
computer for a while, but it sucks. Always crashes. So I took it off.
I never used it though, it was the feeling of haveing an expensive
program on my computer.
Margus Ramst wrote:
>
> Making a Celeron SMP system is in no way comparable to cracking programs.
> You can't remarket a Celeron-based SMP system as a Xeon system. It's just
> greedy marketing politics, nothing more. Breaking the multiplier lock would
> be a better example. It's not illegal per se, but it allows for illegal
> remarketing of overclocked processors. Not that I support multiplier (or
> bus) locking in any way.
>
> And you mean to say you never used the working warez you DLed? Well, if you
> say so. I'm not the one to impugn your integrity :)
>
> Margus
>
> portelli wrote in message <37197A90.CFEDEAE2@pilot.msu.edu>...
> >There will always be warez software. If there is copy protection
> >someone will want to find a way to crack it. Like with Playstation
> >games, and finding out how to make the Celeron SMP capable. I used to
> >like just trying to find a working copy of programs. It was all in the
> >search. When I obtained a working program I just kept it as a trophy,
> >until I ran out of diskspace. Now I search for good freeware programs.
> >(Which is harder since there is so much out there.)
> >
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I agree to your point about cracking being inevitable.
As for the other thig: not letting Intel rip you off _does not_ equal
ripping off Intel. You legally buy a few Celerons. You stick them into a
multi-processor MB. You add a few wires. All nice and legal. You could now
attach it to a industrial power supply and enjoy the fireworks. Stupid - but
stupidity is, unfortunately, legal.
This is as legal as you proverbial FSB-frequency overclocking, supported
by most motherboards. People are overclocking their Celeron 300 to 450MHz,
getting (very nearly) the same performance as a PII-450, which is 10X more
expensive. Is it fair to say they rip off Intel? In my opinion, no.
And to claim people who _use_ pirated software are the evil ones - I'd
say that's a bit too simple. When you just crack something, OK, fine. But
when you make it publicly available, you know quite well that people are
gonna use it and the authors are gonna get ripped off. Ergo, you are the
"evil one".
Although it has been mentioned before, consider this: I will probably
never buy MAX. At least not in the near future. I'd hate to tell you how
many months' average salary it would cost in Estonia. So if I get a pirated
version, who's worse off for it? I am not a potential customer Kinetix would
lose in this deal.
So I think the culprits are those who crack software _and_ make it
available. They are the ones legal users should be angry at.
I could continue along the lines of the futility of flaming warez users.
But i have no wish to tread onto that thin ice.
This concludes tonight's essay about the good and evil of mankind.
Margus
portelli wrote in message <371### [at] pilot msuedu>...
>Ya it the same in a sense. Intel wants you to pay high prices if you
>want a SMP system. If you make your Celeron a SMP system you will pay
>magnitudes less for it. Your right you can't remarket a Celeron as a
>Xeon, but how much performance increase do you get for paying 10 times
>as much money to buy a true Xeon system. Not much, or not enough for
>the price I should say. My point was if something can be cracked
>someone will do it. No matter what. They are not the evil ones, the
>people who actually use the pirated software are.
>
>Used it in what way? No I havn't really. I admit I had Photoshop on my
>computer for a while, but it sucks. Always crashes. So I took it off.
>I never used it though, it was the feeling of haveing an expensive
>program on my computer.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Margus Ramst wrote:
> I could continue along the lines of the futility of flaming warez users.
> But i have no wish to tread onto that thin ice.
>
> This concludes tonight's essay about the good and evil of mankind.
>
> Margus
To all concerned and no one in particular,
Personaly I don't believe this is the proper forum for this type of
discussion anyway. This topic is both old and is overworked about as much
as using the checker pattern on a plane object in Pov. c.g.r.r. would
be a much better place to move this discussion to so as not to fill this
group with unrelated clutter.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I personally have said all I'm gonna say on the subject. And the subject
itself is probably no less stale in any other newsgroup. The outcome is
predictable and pointless. So I support dropping it altogether.
Margus
Ken wrote in message <371A65B1.D4EDF222@pacbell.net>...
>
>To all concerned and no one in particular,
>
> Personaly I don't believe this is the proper forum for this type of
>discussion anyway. This topic is both old and is overworked about as much
>as using the checker pattern on a plane object in Pov. c.g.r.r. would
>be a much better place to move this discussion to so as not to fill this
>group with unrelated clutter.
>
>--
>Ken Tyler
>
>mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> ...subject, Pov-Ray being freeway and all. The poll is: What do you think
> about Warez software? For those that don't know Warez= pirated software.
I love the stuff. It allows you to try software not available as a demo, or
try the full capabilities of normally-free demo/crippled software. Also, if
you're into it, you have an idea when programs and games are coming out
ahead of time, and what beta compile they're currently on. Unfortunately,
keeping the stuff is illegal, so that isn't good. Also companies lose 'a lot
of money' every year because of it. If their programs cost less in the first
place, more people would buy them. Free updates would also help their
industry a lot. It sickens me to buy a $500 program and find out that I need
to buy a $295 update.
One thing that I hate is living in a LatinAmerican country where 77% of
software comes from illegal sources. Another thing I hate is this stupid
school I got to. A teacher wanted us to turn in our homework done with
Excel. None of us owns Excel, so we told him. What does he answer back? 'I
don't care.' So we all _had_ to get it or risk failing that subject. I for
one can't afford it, it's a miracle that I own _any_ software at all, which
is why I turn to freeware so often. I love it more than warez. Long live
POV, and FMP, and sPatch, and Linux, and...
Good day.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I wont provide you with actual numbers, because they are irrelevant, but I will
absolutlely support your claim with actual experience on a gammers platform. The
money and man power that goes into developing games ( especially games that run
on multiple platforms) is staggering. "Skull Monkeys" for example, consumed
thousands of man-hours and several million dollars just to get it out of alpha
stage - and it runs on an existing engine - no new innovative technology here -
yet still, unnbelievable overhead to just get started. I can only imagine that
math intensive software - with faultless memory regulation - that must run on
unique engines has to have an upfront cost that would boggle the mind.
KB-
Johannes Hubert wrote:
> Scott McDonald wrote in message <37193873.8F4B0122@metrolink.com>...
> >Lance Birch wrote:
> >>
> >> Hmm, let me think... It's illegal?
> >>
> >> Personally I hate people that pirate MAX... mainly because it raises the
> >> price for me... and also because I'm sick of seeing terrible work made
> with
> >
> >naw, thats a convenient excuse for Autodesk to charge a ridiculous
> >amount of money for it.
> [snip]
>
> Crap!
>
> This is one of the dumbest but unfortunately most used arguments in the
> discussion about pirate copies.
>
> And it just isn't true!
>
> Mark well, I don't want to defend the price of MAX here in particular (I am
> certain that part of the money you pay goes into the "image" and the "name"
> of the product, just as SGI workstations or Apple Computers [or many other
> high-tech prodcuts from elite-brands - anyone bought a pair of Nike shoes
> lateley? See, you paid for the image too!] are not really worth the money
> they cost - if you simply add up the cost for the hardware components.
>
> The point I want to make is, that software is not expensive because software
> firms are asking ridiculous prices which they only can get away with because
> there is no alternative. In reality, software is so expensive because it
> simply *is* very expensive to develop.
> Especially such large projects as MAX. I would guess (totally without
> underlying facts, but close to the truth I guess) that there easily went
> several centuries of man-work into the development of MAX. (A small team of
> 25 working for 4 years would already add up to one century!)
> And the people developing the software are not some underpaid and exploited
> third-world "slaves" but highly educated professionals that, justily, demand
> good money for good work. Add this together with the costs for promotion
> etc., and you will soon see why a software that is sold in such
> (comparativly) small numbers as MAX will always cost a *lot*.
>
> And Lance is right:
>
> Kinetix is putting effort (and money!) into developing protection (dongles
> etc.) which they wouldn't need in a perfect world. It is clear that at the
> end the customer pays for this added costs.
> This doesn't even count the lost revenues from pirated software that was not
> sold (and therefor did not add to the total income made with the product).
>
> Johannes.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>...but this is all unrelated to warez really, which is a blatant illegal
act.
>As to how it relates to POV-Ray, well, it doesn't. POV-Ray is free! If
someone
>doesn't think POV-Ray is any good, that's their problem, not ours.
Um... actually, it isn't... remember there IS a piracy thing in the POV-Ray
docs...
--
Lance.
---
For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
Colorblind - http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/parallax/359/colorblind
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
True, but it requires ignorance on the users end. And anyone who sells POV-Ray
has got to be a real dirt bag. ;)
-Mike
Lance Birch wrote:
> >...but this is all unrelated to warez really, which is a blatant illegal
> act.
> >As to how it relates to POV-Ray, well, it doesn't. POV-Ray is free! If
> someone
> >doesn't think POV-Ray is any good, that's their problem, not ours.
>
> Um... actually, it isn't... remember there IS a piracy thing in the POV-Ray
> docs...
>
> --
> Lance.
>
> ---
> For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
> The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
> For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
> Colorblind - http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/parallax/359/colorblind
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Exactly. I, for example, have a kind of addiction to hunting down and
destroying unwanted 'stuff' with Windows Explorer and Regedit(as in
programs+their registry entries, etc)
"Mike" <pov### [at] aolcom> wrote in message news:3719FB9D.91720D82@aol.com...
> Many people who crack software never release what they do, and many of
those
> don't even use the software. They are hardcore programmers that just love
to
> figure out how things work.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
