POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : 3D lightsabres Server Time
4 Oct 2024 13:09:47 EDT (-0400)
  3D lightsabres (Message 11 to 13 of 13)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: 3D lightsabres
Date: 8 Apr 1999 14:41:14
Message: <370CEA1B.27BCBB34@aol.com>
Yep, done them. And for some reason they aren't near as easy for me to
keep focused on. All the movement going on, you know. Another very real
problem is the "static" caused by the pixels rendered for the two
separate viewpoints, it's very much like the 'jitter' or 'crand' keyword
being used in a regular animation. I don't see any solution to this
aside from using pigments only without any complex texturing anyway.


Noam Lewis wrote:
> 
> Oh, and I forgot to mension my other idea: 3D ANIMATIONS!

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: 3D lightsabres
Date: 8 Apr 1999 14:54:31
Message: <370CED37.7C3FABAC@aol.com>
Yeah, the animated SIS/SIRDS can be neat, though the only ones I've seen
so far weren't much for some reason. Just bouncing balls and such. Too
bad you can't get a poster of one though :(


Lance Birch wrote:
> 
> Have you tried it with SISs?  (aka Autostereograms?)  VERY COOL!!! :-)
> 
> --
> Lance.
> 
> ---
> For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
> The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News


Post a reply to this message

From: Noam Lewis
Subject: Re: 3D lightsabres
Date: 8 Apr 1999 16:27:10
Message: <370D0311.A20ED8B8@netvision.net.il>
The fact is, I did do this, and I was able to "see" them just as easily.
However, it wasn't as cool as stills for some reason. Maybe i'll think
of a different animation, watch out...

Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> Yep, done them. And for some reason they aren't near as easy for me to
> keep focused on. All the movement going on, you know. Another very real
> problem is the "static" caused by the pixels rendered for the two
> separate viewpoints, it's very much like the 'jitter' or 'crand' keyword
> being used in a regular animation. I don't see any solution to this
> aside from using pigments only without any complex texturing anyway.
> 
> Noam Lewis wrote:
> >
> > Oh, and I forgot to mension my other idea: 3D ANIMATIONS!
> 
> --
>  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
>   http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
>  mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.