POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Watch N°2 Server Time
4 Oct 2024 17:18:28 EDT (-0400)
  Watch N°2 (Message 1 to 10 of 10)  
From: Fabien Hénon
Subject: Watch N°2
Date: 25 Feb 1999 14:48:00
Message: <36d5a8f0.0@news.povray.org>
Some time ago, I posted a picture of my own watch.
Here is a news version rendered with Mark Gordon's Linux compilation of
Linux : Great thanks to him.
Once the I/O bugs are fixed, it could be a very near official version
for Linux. But that's up to pov-team to decide.



Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'montre.jpg' (188 KB)

Preview of image 'montre.jpg'
montre.jpg


 

From: Ken
Subject:
Date: 25 Feb 1999 16:03:15
Message: <36D5BA0B.BA200E68@pacbell.net>

> 
> Some time ago, I posted a picture of my own watch.
> Here is a news version rendered with Mark Gordon's Linux compilation of
> Linux : Great thanks to him.
> Once the I/O bugs are fixed, it could be a very near official version
> for Linux. But that's up to pov-team to decide.
> 



 I've really enjoyed watching the evolution of this watch. Got a spiffy
new background, the band is different (?), it is in really sharp focus
and it screams "hey I'm real ! ". I do miss that little droplet on the
watch crystal though. I knew what it was right away and enjoyed listening
to people trying to figure out what it was. Very nice.

What do you do for your next trick ?

-- 
Ken Tyler

mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net


Post a reply to this message

From: David Wilkinson
Subject:
Date: 25 Feb 1999 17:27:04
Message: <36d6cb13.1289639@news.povray.org>

<ffj### [at] club-internetfr@club-internet.fr> wrote:

>Some time ago, I posted a picture of my own watch.
>Here is a news version rendered with Mark Gordon's Linux compilation of
>Linux : Great thanks to him.
>Once the I/O bugs are fixed, it could be a very near official version
>for Linux. But that's up to pov-team to decide.
>

>
Ken has said nearly everything.  When you showed me your first attempt
over a year ago I was quite knocked out by it and now it seems even
more realistic.  I like the dramatic closeness of the image and the
fact that it is lying on that steel decking (great material! how about
letting us peep at the code for that?)  I am not so sure about the
small trace of oil/water on the left of the watch. It doesn't convince
me and the strap texture seems rather wooden.  But I wish I had
created it - congratulations!
David
------------
dav### [at] cwcomnet
http://www.hamiltonite.mcmail.com
------------


Post a reply to this message

From: Bryan Garnett-Law
Subject: Re: Watch N°2
Date: 25 Feb 1999 19:21:05
Message: <36d5e8f1.0@news.povray.org>
Stunning Piccie!!!!
-- 
Bryan Garnett-Law


----------

<ffj### [at] club-internetfr@club-internet.fr> wrote:


> Some time ago, I posted a picture of my own watch.
> Here is a news version rendered with Mark Gordon's Linux compilation of
> Linux : Great thanks to him.
> Once the I/O bugs are fixed, it could be a very near official version
> for Linux. But that's up to pov-team to decide.
>

>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Hans-Detlev Fink
Subject: Re: Watch N°2
Date: 26 Feb 1999 08:59:11
Message: <36D6A88A.C6E31209@pecos.nospam.de>
Hey, one of the best close-ups I've seen.

  Just out of curiosity: What are those I/O bugs you're talking about?
I seem to remember that I squashed the last one a couple of weeks
ago. Seriously: Are there any IO bugs left in Mark's version?
Or did I miss some news discussion?

-Hans-


> 
> Some time ago, I posted a picture of my own watch.
> Here is a news version rendered with Mark Gordon's Linux compilation of
> Linux : Great thanks to him.
> Once the I/O bugs are fixed, it could be a very near official version
> for Linux. But that's up to pov-team to decide.
> 

> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Watch N°2
Date: 26 Feb 1999 20:00:34
Message: <36D74387.55135D49@aol.com>
Thrilled to have seen this. Thanks for the opportunity, Fabien.



> 
> Some time ago, I posted a picture of my own watch.
> Here is a news version rendered with Mark Gordon's Linux compilation of
> Linux : Great thanks to him.
> Once the I/O bugs are fixed, it could be a very near official version
> for Linux. But that's up to pov-team to decide.
> 

> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?PoV


Post a reply to this message

From: Fabien Hénon
Subject: Re: Watch N°2
Date: 27 Feb 1999 04:20:35
Message: <36d7b8e3.0@news.povray.org>
I think I am going to drop the watch (virtually of course) and go onto
something else. I had to stop "raytracing" for a few months, and worked with
the watch script to be up to it again : I forgot how messy an uncommented
script can be !

Cheers !






> >
> > Some time ago, I posted a picture of my own watch.
> > Here is a news version rendered with Mark Gordon's Linux compilation of
> > Linux : Great thanks to him.
> > Once the I/O bugs are fixed, it could be a very near official version
> > for Linux. But that's up to pov-team to decide.
> >

>
>  I've really enjoyed watching the evolution of this watch. Got a spiffy
> new background, the band is different (?), it is in really sharp focus
> and it screams "hey I'm real ! ". I do miss that little droplet on the
> watch crystal though. I knew what it was right away and enjoyed listening
> to people trying to figure out what it was. Very nice.
>
> What do you do for your next trick ?
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Fabien Hénon
Subject: Re: Watch N°2
Date: 27 Feb 1999 04:26:51
Message: <36d7ba5b.0@news.povray.org>
The last time I read one of Mark's post, it was about Input and Ouput bugs. That
was some time ago and they may be fixed by now.
I guess I'd better check at the programming forum.





> Hey, one of the best close-ups I've seen.
>
>   Just out of curiosity: What are those I/O bugs you're talking about?
> I seem to remember that I squashed the last one a couple of weeks
> ago. Seriously: Are there any IO bugs left in Mark's version?
> Or did I miss some news discussion?
>
> -Hans-
>

> >
> > Some time ago, I posted a picture of my own watch.
> > Here is a news version rendered with Mark Gordon's Linux compilation of
> > Linux : Great thanks to him.
> > Once the I/O bugs are fixed, it could be a very near official version
> > for Linux. But that's up to pov-team to decide.
> >

> >
> >   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

From: Markus Becker
Subject: Re: Watch N°2
Date: 23 Mar 1999 11:08:28
Message: <36F7BD06.F8106EFC@zess.uni-siegen.de>
After seeing that, I stared about 5 seconds at the screen
waiting for the second's hand to tick....

Great.

Is the Background a bumpmap or is it for real?

Markus
-- 

 Ich nicht eine Sekunde!!!" H. Heinol in Val Thorens


Post a reply to this message

From: Fabien HENON
Subject:
Date: 23 Mar 1999 17:33:13
Message: <36F832E4.35CC46CE@club-internet.fr>
Thanks for the comments.

The background are tiling height_fields made with a picture done with
Rhino, then exported to the EPS format, then to TGA format.





> After seeing that, I stared about 5 seconds at the screen
> waiting for the second's hand to tick....
>
> Great.
>
> Is the Background a bumpmap or is it for real?
>
> Markus
> --

>  Ich nicht eine Sekunde!!!" H. Heinol in Val Thorens


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.