 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I rendered this to give my system a chance to strech its legs a little
on media (cause I dont use it and I like the image)
Anyway, it took nearly 8h 30m to render with the intervals for the cloud
and atmostphere media at 10, and the AA at 0.3 at 800x600.
I have a PII 400 mhz, 64M, it dosent take a lot of memory, just a lot of
time.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'evening.jpg' (32 KB)
Preview of image 'evening.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Absolutely beautiful!!
The cloud colours and shapes are about the best I have ever seen, truely
awesome.
Now, a little work on the landscape - a nice forest or something - and this
could be a real masterpiece ...
Hoping to see many more such pictures,
Mike Andrews.
Paul Swagerty wrote:
> I rendered this to give my system a chance to strech its legs a little
> on media (cause I dont use it and I like the image)
> Anyway, it took nearly 8h 30m to render with the intervals for the cloud
> and atmostphere media at 10, and the AA at 0.3 at 800x600.
> I have a PII 400 mhz, 64M, it dosent take a lot of memory, just a lot of
> time.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Awesome! This is the coolest sky I've ever seen in POV! Is learning
media hard? How long did it take to render that image? I tried a media
image once and it took 15 minutes to render the first 1%. Great job!
Eugene
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Unfortunatly I did not make this image, as I seemed to imply in my post. This
was the image created by the source that Abe posted in binaries.scene-files
and he is the creator of the image, though I do agree, I think this is one of
the best pov-skys that I have ever seen.
Paul
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Any idea what caused the very smooth, small, cloud part seen upwards
from the right side of the suns disk? Looks unlike any of the other
clouds.
8.5 hours on a 400MHz PII...? Not too encouraging for the impatient.
With those intervals and/or samples turned up that would be a lengthy
render but I guess not altogether out of the question.
Paul Swagerty wrote:
>
> Unfortunatly I did not make this image, as I seemed to imply in my post. This
> was the image created by the source that Abe posted in binaries.scene-files
> and he is the creator of the image, though I do agree, I think this is one of
> the best pov-skys that I have ever seen.
> Paul
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
=Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paul Swagerty wrote in message <36BB4D76.8EEA3C4C@csus.edu>...
>Unfortunatly I did not make this image, as I seemed to imply in my post.
This
>was the image created by the source that Abe posted in binaries.scene-files
>and he is the creator of the image, though I do agree, I think this is one
of
>the best pov-skys that I have ever seen.
>Paul
>
>
Uh,...huh?
Well, anyway.
This took not quite 5 hours on my P200 MMX (at 800x600). I cut the number of
rays down to four with the +r2 switch.
GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansas net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
