|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hiyas, I saw a post by Ken a while ago, and here is a reply.
Did this for a friend(in a far bigger size)
Thought I'd share it with you :-)
//Spider
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cheeta_small1.jpg' (36 KB)
Preview of image 'cheeta_small1.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Spider wrote:
>
> Hiyas, I saw a post by Ken a while ago, and here is a reply.
> Did this for a friend(in a far bigger size)
>
> Thought I'd share it with you :-)
>
> //Spider
>
>
You rendered this?
Reminds me of some images I processed in PaintShopPro:
make a copy, emboss one copy and re-combine time. Gives a similar result.
Regards,
Remco
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Remco de Korte wrote:
>
> Spider wrote:
> >
> > Hiyas, I saw a post by Ken a while ago, and here is a reply.
> > Did this for a friend(in a far bigger size)
> >
> > Thought I'd share it with you :-)
> >
> > //Spider
> >
> >
> You rendered this?
>
> Reminds me of some images I processed in PaintShopPro:
> make a copy, emboss one copy and re-combine time. Gives a similar result.
>
> Regards,
>
> Remco
News Flash - The infamous Spider joins Ken in 2D raytacing competition...
It is a rendered height field with the image that produced it
image mapped on top.
Oh yeah - Nice image Spider.
Which post were you referring to ?
--
Ken Tyler
tyl### [at] pacbellnet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
<snippety snap>
> News Flash - The infamous Spider joins Ken in 2D raytacing competition...
Whooa, hold it. infamous ?? *chuckle* *grin*
>
> It is a rendered height field with the image that produced it
> image mapped on top.
Yuppers.
> Oh yeah - Nice image Spider.
Thankyou, oh most famed tracer of rays and tist of Ar.
> Which post were you referring to ?
You made one a few months(?) ago, a rose or a tulip or something like
taht, for a web-page competition, about remaking an image .... Memory
fading...
//Spider
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Spider wrote:
>
> Ken wrote:
> >
> <snippety snap>
>
> > News Flash - The infamous Spider joins Ken in 2D raytacing competition...
> Whooa, hold it. infamous ?? *chuckle* *grin*
> >
> > It is a rendered height field with the image that produced it
> > image mapped on top.
> Yuppers.
>
> > Oh yeah - Nice image Spider.
> Thankyou, oh most famed tracer of rays and tist of Ar.
> > Which post were you referring to ?
> You made one a few months(?) ago, a rose or a tulip or something like
> taht, for a web-page competition, about remaking an image .... Memory
> fading...
>
> //Spider
Actualy that one was 3d. It had a scene depth from the camera to
the back wall of like 400 pov units. It really takes talent to
make a 3D scene look 2D I guess :)
--
Ken Tyler
tyl### [at] pacbellnet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
<snip>
> Actualy that one was 3d. It had a scene depth from the camera to
> the back wall of like 400 pov units. It really takes talent to
> make a 3D scene look 2D I guess :)
Yup, it does.. :-)
This one is a HF+imagemap, as you can guess... i moved the light a bit
so it wouldn't look "too" 2Dish... Had I had that in the same angle as
the camera, one would only belived it was a speckled image... not that
fun :-)
It takes some tricks to make 3D look 2D without looking too much 2D.
2-D
//Spider
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |